Back to the study

Geron

geron.com · Technology · GERN

Ranked 1,278 of 2,047 companies in the study

30Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness50
What this means for Geron

AI assistants do not name Geron in any of their answers to questions about the market. Its overall score is 30 out of 100, ranking 1,278th of 2,047 companies and 199th of 273 in its sector. The website passes 7 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the technology market: none named Geron. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical technology company is named in 10.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Geron ranks 236 of 273 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
7/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
199 of 273
by overall score, where the typical technology company scores 36
How Geron compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
50

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with technology

273 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score30
Ranks 199 of 273. Typical company: 36
Named in answers0%
Ranks 236 of 273. Typical company: 10%
AI readiness50
Ranks 4 of 273. Typical company: 29
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Geron
0.0%
Bristol Myers Squibb (Onureg, Reblozyl, Vidaza)
0.0%
AbbVie (Venclexta / Venetoclax)
0.0%
Incyte (Jakafi)
0.0%
Novartis (Promacta, Tasigna, Scemblix)
0.0%
Jazz Pharmaceuticals (Vyxeos)
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
18 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPartly met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourcePassed

    Metadata telling agents which authorization server to use.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 42 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.geron.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

7 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • PassedOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
100
cancer.org
32
bloodcancerunited.org
23
cancer.gov
22
ascopubs.org
21
bloodcancer.org.uk
15
ashpublications.org
14
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
14
mayoclinic.org
13
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
13

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • How do disease-modifying therapies for myelofibrosis compare to symptom management options?
  • What should I do if my blood cancer medication stops working?
  • Are there therapies specifically designed for people newly diagnosed with lower-risk blood cancers?
  • How much do advanced therapies for blood cancers typically cost in the United States?
  • Are there financial assistance programs available for blood cancer treatments?
  • Which treatments can help patients with blood cancer regain daily functioning and improve quality of life?
  • What are the differences between injectable and oral medications for blood cancers?
  • Which non-chemotherapy options exist for people with myelodysplastic syndromes?
  • What are the alternatives to transfusion support for managing low blood counts in blood cancer?
  • How do I manage side effects like anemia or low platelets during blood cancer treatment?
  • Is it worth pursuing recently FDA-approved treatments for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes?
  • What other supportive care strategies can help manage symptoms of myelofibrosis besides medication?
  • Which treatments provide the most relief from fatigue and low energy in blood cancer patients?
  • What are the most promising new therapies for treating lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes?
  • Should patients with myelofibrosis consider disease-modifying therapy or stick with supportive care?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo