Back to the study

GEO Group

geogroup.com · Finance · GEO

Ranked 1,435 of 2,047 companies in the study

28Overall score
  • Visibility7
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness14
What this means for GEO Group

AI assistants rarely name GEO Group, mentioning it in 1 of 60 answers. Its overall score is 28 out of 100, ranking 1,435th of 2,047 companies in the study. The website passes 2 of 14 technical checks that measure how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the finance market: none named GEO Group. AI assistants named it in 1 of 60 answers (1.7%). The typical finance company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, GEO Group ranks 106 of 205 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
1.7%
1 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
14.3%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
107 of 205
by overall score, where the typical finance company scores 29
How GEO Group compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
7

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
14

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with finance

205 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score28
Ranks 107 of 205. Typical company: 29
Named in answers2%
Ranks 106 of 205. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness14
Ranks 180 of 205. Typical company: 21
What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

“How much do full-service correctional facility management contracts typically cost in the US?”

Full-service correctional facility management contracts in the US are typically priced as a per-detainee/per-inmate per day rate rather than a single flat fee, and the reported rates vary widely by facility type and contract scope. In the sources provided, that range runs from about $28 to $162 per detainee per day for ICE detention facilities, with a median of $75 per detainee per day in FY 2019.

For prison management specifically, examples in the record include roughly $35.25 per prisoner per day for an estimated private facility cost in Texas, versus $44.40 fo …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

GEO Group
50.0%
Management & Training Corporation (MTC)
50.0%
CoreCivic
0.0%
LaSalle Corrections
0.0%
The Nakamoto Group
0.0%
Corizon Health
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Perplexity
1/15
Gemini
0/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
0 of 100
  • robots.txtNot met

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
0 of 100
  • AI bot rulesNot met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
10 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPassed

    OpenID Connect or OAuth metadata agents can use to sign in.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 3 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · geogroup.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

ojp.gov
40
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
20
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
15
bop.gov
14
bja.ojp.gov
13
uscourts.gov
11
urban.org
11
nij.ojp.gov
10
justice.gov
10
prisonpolicy.org
8

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (1 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What are the main differences between community-based supervision programs and in-custody rehabilitation?
  • Why do some offender management systems fail to deliver lower recidivism rates?
  • What types of evidence-based rehabilitation programs are most effective in reducing recidivism?
  • Which offender management solutions offer both supervision and support after release?
  • How can correctional institutions address challenges with participant engagement in rehabilitation programs?
  • What are alternatives to traditional incarceration for non-violent offenders?
  • What are effective ways to combine in-custody education with post-release support?
  • Is investing in post-release support programs an effective use of correctional budgets?
  • What are the best practices for managing correctional facilities with a focus on rehabilitation?
  • What community-based rehabilitation options exist for states looking to reduce prison populations?
  • How much do full-service correctional facility management contracts typically cost in the US?
  • What factors affect the price of implementing individualized offender rehabilitation plans?
  • How does direct government-operated corrections differ from private management in terms of rehabilitation services?
  • Are comprehensive correctional management services worth the cost for state agencies?
  • How can jails implement evidence-based substance abuse treatment for inmates?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo