- Visibility12
- Citations0
- Sentiment58
- Site quality80
- AI readiness14
AI assistants name General Dynamics in 6.7% of answers, which is slightly more often than the typical company in its sector. Its overall score is 30 out of 100, placing it 1,220th of 2,047 companies. The company's website passes 2 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.
We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named General Dynamics. AI assistants named it in 4 of 60 answers (6.7%). The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, General Dynamics ranks 97 of 246 in its sector.
Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.
This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named
Five parts, each scored out of 100.
How often AI assistants name the company
How often AI uses the company's own website as a source
How positively AI describes the company
How well built the website's own pages are
How easily AI tools can read and use the website
Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.
246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.
An answer that names the company
“What other solutions are available to replace legacy ground combat vehicles?”
The replacement of legacy ground combat vehicles is focusing on several advanced solutions, primarily driven by the need for increased lethality, survivability, and adaptability, often leveraging unmanned and optionally manned technologies.
Key solutions and programs include:
Robotic Combat Vehicles (RCVs): These are crewless vehicles designed to operate autonomously or via remote control, minimizing risk to human personnel and maximizing operational efficiency. They can perform various battlefield roles, including reconnaissance, escort for manned vehicles, logistics, and even serve …
The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.
How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals
Answers naming it, out of answers received
What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.
- 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.
Show every check, for your technical teamHide the checks
- study: 92.0%robots.txtNot met
Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.
- study: 86.8%SitemapPartly met
Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.
- study: 0.3%Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
- study: 5.5%DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present
Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.
- study: 1.9%Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
- study: 25.1%llms.txtNot met
Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.
- study: 93.4%AI bot rulesPartly met
Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.
- study: 1.4%Content SignalsNot met
Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.
- study: 0.2%Web Bot AuthNot present
Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.
- study: 0.3%API CatalogNot met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
- study: 11.8%OAuth discoveryNot met
Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.
- study: 10.3%OAuth Protected ResourceNot met
Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.
- study: 0.0%auth.mdNot met
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
- study: 0.2%MCP Server CardNot met
Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.
- study: 0.1%A2A Agent CardNot met
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
- study: 0.2%Agent SkillsNot met
Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.
- study: 33.7%WebMCPCould not check
Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.
- study: 0.1%ARD manifestNot met
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
Score 14 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 4, 2026 · gd.com · 2,047 companies scanned
2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.
These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.
Show the 14 checksHide them
- Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
- PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
- Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
- Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
- Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
- PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
- Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
- Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
- Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
- Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
- Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
- Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers
In the study as S&P 500.
- Are nuclear-powered submarines a cost-effective choice for expanding naval capabilities?
- What role do munitions play in enhancing ground force effectiveness?
- Which combat vehicles are most reliable for military operations?
- How can shipbuilding services support modern naval fleet upgrades?
- What factors influence the pricing of advanced aerospace solutions in the US?
- How are costs for integrated weapons systems typically structured for government contracts?
- Business aviation vs military aviation — what are the key differences in technology and safety features?
- What alternatives exist to traditional manned aircraft in modern defense operations?
- Is investing in advanced weapons systems worth it for national security needs?
- What other solutions are available to replace legacy ground combat vehicles?
- How do C4ISR solutions compare to traditional communication systems in defense applications?
- What are the best aerospace and defense solutions for government agencies in the US?
- Are there cost-effective substitutes for advanced C4ISR capabilities in defense communications?
- Why might integrated defense IT systems fail during deployment?
- What are common maintenance challenges with armored combat vehicles?
Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.
A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.
<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/gd.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/gd.com.svg" alt="Overall score 30 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>