Back to the study

FTI Consulting

fticonsulting.com · Industrial · FCN

Ranked 1,717 of 2,047 companies in the study

26Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness29
What this means for FTI Consulting

AI assistants do not name FTI Consulting in any of the 60 answers, while they name others like Kroll and AlixPartners. The company has an overall score of 26 out of 100, ranking 1,717th of 2,047 overall. Its website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named FTI Consulting. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, FTI Consulting ranks 191 of 246 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
190 of 246
by overall score, where the typical industrial company scores 31
How FTI Consulting compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with industrial

246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score26
Ranks 190 of 246. Typical company: 31
Named in answers0%
Ranks 191 of 246. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness29
Ranks 34 of 246. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“What are the top business consulting services for companies facing complex challenges?”

Companies facing complex challenges often turn to top-tier business consulting services for expert guidance and strategic solutions. These firms offer in-depth industry knowledge, analytical expertise, and a fresh perspective to help businesses overcome hurdles, drive growth, and achieve long-term success.

Some of the top business consulting services for complex challenges include:

McKinsey & Company: Renowned for its global presence and comprehensive strategic advice, McKinsey focuses on data-driven insights and innovative problem-solving. They help businesses transform operations, …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Named instead
Kroll1AlixPartners1Alvarez & Marsal1
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Deloitte Consulting
78.9%
AlixPartners
5.3%
Alvarez & Marsal
5.3%
EY (Ernst & Young) Advisory Services
5.3%
Kroll
5.3%
FTI Consulting
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
25 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtPartly met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 37 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.fticonsulting.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

nmsconsulting.com
16
linkedin.com
8
consultingsuccess.com
8
bcg.com
8
consulting.us
8
bain.com
8
kpmg.com
7
clutch.co
7
deloitte.com
7
worldmetrics.org
6

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • In-house advisory teams vs external consultants—pros and cons for large enterprises
  • What drives the cost of strategic risk management consulting?
  • What are the top business consulting services for companies facing complex challenges?
  • Consulting services that help companies optimize performance during periods of change
  • What should you do if your strategic advisory project stalls or delivers poor results?
  • Is hiring a business consulting firm worth it for mid-sized enterprises?
  • How can management advisors support organizations facing regulatory investigations?
  • How do you know if your organization needs outside management advisory?
  • Common issues when working with external consulting firms and how to avoid them
  • Alternatives to hiring a full-service business consulting firm
  • Difference between strategic advisory and operational consulting for large organizations
  • Where can US companies find specialized consulting services for digital transformation?
  • Risk management advisory vs organizational transformation consulting—how do they stack up?
  • Best ways to find expert management advisory for risk management in US corporations
  • Typical fee structures for business consulting and management advisory services in the US
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo