Back to the study

Expeditors International

expeditors.com · Industrial · EXPD

Ranked 1,393 of 2,047 companies in the study

28Overall score
  • Visibility10
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness14
What this means for Expeditors International

AI assistants name Expeditors International in 8.3% of answers, which is more often than the typical company in the industrial sector. Its overall score is 28 out of 100, ranking 1,393rd of 2,047. The company’s website passes 2 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named Expeditors International. AI assistants named it in 5 of 60 answers (8.3%). The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Expeditors International ranks 87 of 246 in its sector.

Named by AI in
8.3%
5 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
11.6%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
159 of 246
by overall score, where the typical industrial company scores 31
How Expeditors International compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
10

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
14

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with industrial

246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score28
Ranks 159 of 246. Typical company: 31
Named in answers8%
Ranks 87 of 246. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness14
Ranks 207 of 246. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“Best international freight forwarding options for U.S. companies expanding overseas”

For U.S. companies expanding overseas, selecting the best international freight forwarding option is crucial for seamless global operations. These companies act as intermediaries, managing the complex logistics of international shipping, including booking carrier space, handling documentation, and navigating customs.

Top International Freight Forwarders for U.S. Businesses:

Several prominent international freight forwarders operate in the U.S. and offer extensive global networks and services. Some of the top-ranked include:

Sims Global Solutions: A U.S.-based 3PL and freight bro …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Kuehne+Nagel11C.H. Robinson6DB Schenker4
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Kuehne+Nagel
26.3%
C.H. Robinson
15.8%
DHL Global Forwarding
15.8%
UPS Supply Chain Solutions
15.8%
Expeditors International
13.2%
DB Schenker
13.2%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Perplexity
2/15
Gemini
1/15
Claude
1/15
OpenAI
1/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
41 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
10 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryPassed

    OpenID Connect or OAuth metadata agents can use to sign in.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 20 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.expeditors.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

dhl.com
33
linkedin.com
9
inboundlogistics.com
8
goodfirms.co
8
sekologistics.com
7
finance.yahoo.com
7
ups.com
7
justdial.com
6
freightwaves.com
6
ship4wd.com
6

In the study as S&P 500.

Every question, and where the company came up (2 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • How are global supply chain management services typically priced for U.S. businesses?
  • What are other options besides full-service logistics solutions for small businesses importing goods?
  • Differences between managed transportation services and traditional logistics providers
  • Best international freight forwarding options for U.S. companies expanding overseas
  • What logistics approaches work best for managing retail and fashion distribution across borders?
  • How does freight forwarding compare to integrated supply chain management for large-scale distribution?
  • Alternatives to using a single provider for global logistics and supply chain management
  • Which logistics services offer specialized support for energy or aerospace sectors?
  • What are common challenges faced when coordinating global shipments for multiple industries?
  • Do sensor-based logistics services make a noticeable difference in tracking shipments?
  • What factors influence freight forwarding rates for international shipments?
  • How can healthcare companies benefit from specialized global logistics support?
  • Is investing in end-to-end supply chain solutions worth it for mid-sized manufacturers?
  • How to resolve delays in customs clearance during international logistics operations
  • What are the most reliable global logistics solutions for businesses with complex supply chain needs?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 28 of 100 badge for Expeditors International

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/expeditors.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/expeditors.com.svg" alt="Overall score 28 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo