Back to the study

Envista Holdings

envistaco.com · Healthcare · NVST

Ranked 1,712 of 2,047 companies in the study

26Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness29
What this means for Envista Holdings

AI assistants do not name Envista Holdings in any of their answers to everyday healthcare market questions, out of 60 answers reviewed. Envista Holdings has an overall score of 26 out of 100, ranking 1,712th of 2,047 companies in the study. Its website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the healthcare market: none named Envista Holdings. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical healthcare company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, Envista Holdings ranks 69 of 105 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
81 of 105
by overall score, where the typical healthcare company scores 31
How Envista Holdings compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with healthcare

105 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score26
Ranks 81 of 105. Typical company: 31
Named in answers0%
Ranks 69 of 105. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness29
Ranks 24 of 105. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“Which dental solutions are best suited for multi-specialty clinics?”

Multi-specialty dental clinics require robust dental solutions that can manage diverse needs across various specialties, often in multiple locations. The most suitable solutions are typically integrated practice management systems (PMS) that offer comprehensive features, scalability, and cloud-based accessibility.

Here are some key dental solutions and characteristics best suited for multi-specialty clinics:

1. Integrated Practice Management Software (PMS)

An all-in-one PMS is crucial for multi-specialty clinics, as it centralizes various aspects of practice management. These systems sh …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Named instead
Dentsply Sirona2
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Straumann Group
37.5%
Dentsply Sirona
25.0%
Henry Schein Dental
12.5%
Zimmer Biomet Dental
12.5%
Planmeca USA
12.5%
Envista Holdings
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
0 of 100
  • robots.txtNot met

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
0 of 100
  • AI bot rulesNot met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 0 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · envistaco.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 1 AI crawler by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBot*allowed
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
51
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
11
curvedental.com
9
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
8
dentaleconomics.com
7
dentistdecoded.com
7
dentistryiq.com
6
3shape.com
6
carecredit.com
6
avadent.com
5

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Average price ranges for implant and orthodontic systems in the U.S.
  • Which dental solutions are best suited for multi-specialty clinics?
  • Digital workflow vs traditional impressions in dental offices—what are the main pros and cons?
  • Is investing in advanced dental equipment worth it for a general practice?
  • What are some options besides implants for tooth replacement?
  • How do orthodontic systems compare to clear aligner treatments in terms of results and efficiency?
  • How to address patient discomfort with recent dental implant placements
  • Are premium specialty dental products really better than standard consumables?
  • What workflow tools help dental professionals collaborate more efficiently?
  • Alternatives to traditional orthodontic treatments for adult patients
  • Common issues when integrating new dental workflows and how to resolve them
  • Top digital workflow systems recommended for modern dental practices
  • What are the best dental implant solutions for improving patient outcomes?
  • What can affect the cost of implementing digital dental technology in a practice?
  • Are there more affordable digital workflow platforms for small dental practices?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo