Back to the study

Entravision Communications

entravision.com · Media · EVC

Ranked 1,147 of 2,047 companies in the study

31Overall score
  • Visibility9
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness36
What this means for Entravision Communications

AI assistants name Entravision Communications in 5% of answers. This is less often than the typical company in the media sector, which is named in 15% of answers. Its overall score is 31 out of 100, ranking 1,147th of 2,047 companies. The website passes 5 of 14 technical checks for how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the media market: none named Entravision Communications. AI assistants named it in 3 of 60 answers (5.0%). The typical media company is named in 15.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Entravision Communications ranks 66 of 99 in its sector.

Named by AI in
5.0%
3 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
15.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
5/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
59 of 99
by overall score, where the typical media company scores 36
How Entravision Communications compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
9

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
36

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with media

99 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score31
Ranks 59 of 99. Typical company: 36
Named in answers5%
Ranks 66 of 99. Typical company: 15%
AI readiness36
Ranks 13 of 99. Typical company: 29
What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

“Is it worth investing in an advertising technology platform focused on U.S. Latino media?”

Potentially yes, but only if the platform has real scale, strong first-party data, and direct access to premium U.S. Latino inventory. The U.S. Hispanic/Latino market is large and actively being targeted by multiple ad-tech and media companies, but the opportunity is crowded and execution matters more than the niche itself.

What the search results suggest:

There is clear market demand for platforms focused on U.S. Latino audiences. Multiple companies are launching or expanding products specifically aimed at Hispanic/Latino reach, including Entravision …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Canela Media2
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Univision Communications
26.7%
Telemundo (NBCUniversal Telemundo Enterprises)
26.7%
Canela Media
26.7%
Entravision Communications
20.0%
Spanish Broadcasting System (SBS)
0.0%
Mitú
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Perplexity
2/15
OpenAI
1/15
Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent buy here?

We could not tell. The website turned away our requests for the files an agent would read. An agent arriving by itself is turned away the same way.

  • UCPCould not check
  • ACPCould not check
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present

The shop runs on WooCommerce.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
25 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtPartly met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthCould not check

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogCould not check

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryCould not check

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceCould not check

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardCould not check

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardCould not check

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsCould not check

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestCould not check

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 44 of 100 · 65% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · entravision.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

5 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

businesswire.com
27
refuelagency.com
19
adexchanger.com
14
forbes.com
12
nielsen.com
12
linkedin.com
10
digiday.com
10
aidigital.com
10
corporate.televisaunivision.com
9
pewresearch.org
9

In the study as Consumer brands.

Every question, and where the company came up (3 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Other ways to reach Latino audiences besides digital media buying platforms
  • How does programmatic adtech compare to traditional media buying for U.S. brands seeking diverse audiences?
  • Alternatives to programmatic adtech for targeting U.S. Hispanic consumers
  • Average costs for advertising technology platforms specializing in multicultural audiences in the U.S.
  • Is it worth investing in an advertising technology platform focused on U.S. Latino media?
  • What are common use-cases for AI-powered ad platforms targeting bilingual audiences in the United States?
  • Top media platforms for targeting Hispanic consumers in the U.S.
  • Should a business choose a dedicated multicultural advertising solution or a general market ad tech provider?
  • AI-driven advertising platforms vs standard digital ad solutions for multicultural targeting—what are the key differences?
  • How do I resolve low engagement in multicultural digital media campaigns?
  • How can businesses leverage multi-platform advertising to reach Latino consumers in the U.S.?
  • What are the best advertising technology solutions for reaching U.S. Latino audiences?
  • Why might programmatic ad campaigns targeting Hispanic audiences underperform in the U.S. market?
  • How do pricing models work for AI-based programmatic advertising solutions?
  • What features should businesses look for in a multicultural media and advertising technology platform?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 31 of 100 badge for Entravision Communications

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/entravision.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/entravision.com.svg" alt="Overall score 31 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo