Back to the study

Energizer Holdings

energizerholdings.com · Technology · ENR

Ranked 958 of 2,047 companies in the study

33Overall score
  • Visibility21
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness43
What this means for Energizer Holdings

AI assistants name Energizer Holdings in 13.3% of answers, more often than the typical company in the technology sector. Its overall score is 33 out of 100, ranking 958th of 2,047 companies. The company's website passes 6 of 14 technical checks for how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the technology market: none named Energizer Holdings. AI assistants named it in 8 of 60 answers (13.3%). The typical technology company is named in 10.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Energizer Holdings ranks 111 of 273 in its sector.

Named by AI in
13.3%
8 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
32.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
6/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 4
Rank in its sector
167 of 273
by overall score, where the typical technology company scores 36
How Energizer Holdings compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
21

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
43

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with technology

273 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score33
Ranks 167 of 273. Typical company: 36
Named in answers13%
Ranks 111 of 273. Typical company: 10%
AI readiness43
Ranks 14 of 273. Typical company: 29
What Claude actually said

An answer that names the company

“Average price range for bulk AA batteries in the US”

Let me search for more specific pricing information for AA batteries in bulk.Based on the current market data, here's the average price range for bulk AA batteries in the US:

Retail Bulk Pricing

Premium brands typically cost around $14.99 for 48-pack options, with individual retailers showing varying prices. For example, Home Depot sells Duracell Coppertop alkaline AA batteries in 10-packs for $10.28, which equals $1.03 per battery.

Looking at major retailers:

Walmart shows Energizer MAX AA 24-pack batteries at approximately 83.3 cents per battery

Home Depot lists Energizer 36-pack b …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Duracell6
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Energizer Holdings
40.0%
Duracell
35.0%
Panasonic Battery (US)
20.0%
Rayovac
5.0%
Varta Consumer Batteries
0.0%
Eveready Battery Company
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

OpenAI
3/15
Claude
2/15
Gemini
2/15
Perplexity
1/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 32 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · energizerholdings.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

6 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 15 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBot*allowed
  • ClaudeBot*allowed
  • Anthropic-AI*allowed
  • Google-Extended*allowed
  • Applebot-Extended*allowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgent*allowed
  • FacebookBot*allowed
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBot*allowed
  • Claude-SearchBot*allowed
  • PerplexityBot*allowed
  • Applebot*allowed
  • Amazonbot*allowed
  • YouBot*allowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-User*allowed
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBot*allowed
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

nytimes.com
15
amazon.com
13
rei.com
11
consumerreports.org
9
walmart.com
9
ufinebattery.com
8
youtube.com
8
popularmechanics.com
7
gearjunkie.com
7
szaspower.com
7

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (3 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Average price range for bulk AA batteries in the US
  • Lithium batteries versus alkaline batteries for outdoor use
  • How can I prevent my flashlight from corroding its battery contacts?
  • Best battery types for smoke detectors in residential homes
  • Recommended portable lighting solutions for camping trips
  • What are the best solar-powered portable chargers available?
  • Alternatives to disposable batteries for children's toys
  • Why do my TV remote batteries drain so quickly?
  • How much should I expect to pay for a quality LED headlamp?
  • Are high-capacity rechargeable batteries worth the extra cost?
  • Is it worth investing in a portable car jump starter for emergencies?
  • Rechargeable vs single-use batteries for household electronics
  • Popular automotive care products for maintaining car batteries
  • Most reliable portable power options for business travelers in the US
  • What are the best AA batteries for high-drain household devices?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 33 of 100 badge for Energizer Holdings

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/energizerholdings.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/energizerholdings.com.svg" alt="Overall score 33 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo