- Visibility24
- Citations1
- Sentiment91
- Site quality80
- AI readiness43
AI assistants name e.l.f. Cosmetics in 21.7% of answers, much more often than the typical company in the consumer goods sector. Its overall score is 43 out of 100, ranking 190th of 2,047 companies. The website passes 6 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.
We asked 15 unbranded questions about the consumer goods market: none named e.l.f. Cosmetics. AI assistants named it in 13 of 60 answers (21.7%). The typical consumer goods company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, e.l.f. Cosmetics ranks 16 of 118 in its sector.
Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.
This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named
Five parts, each scored out of 100.
How often AI assistants name the company
How often AI uses the company's own website as a source
How positively AI describes the company
How well built the website's own pages are
How easily AI tools can read and use the website
Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.
118 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.
An answer that names the company
“Alternatives to mainstream makeup for cruelty-free and vegan choices on a budget?”
It appears you're looking for affordable, cruelty-free, and vegan makeup options. Here's a breakdown of brands and alternatives that can help you achieve your goal:
Affordable Cruelty-Free & Vegan Makeup Brands
Many brands offer extensive cruelty-free and vegan ranges at budget-friendly prices:
e.l.f. Cosmetics: This brand is widely recognized for its affordability and is 100% vegan and cruelty-free. Products typically range from $1-$6. They offer a wide variety of products for eyes, lips, and face, as well as brushes and tools.
Pacifica Beauty: Pacifica is anoth …
The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.
How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals
Answers naming it, out of answers received
What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.
- Content Signals
Yes. e.l.f. Cosmetics publishes a UCP profile, a file that tells an AI agent how to buy, and it includes checkout.
- UCPPublished
- ACPNot present
- AP2Not present
- x402Not present
- MPPNot present
The shop runs on Shopify.
Show every check, for your technical teamHide the checks
- study: 92.0%robots.txtPassed
A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.
- study: 86.8%SitemapPassed
An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.
- study: 0.3%Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
- study: 5.5%DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present
Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.
- study: 1.9%Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
- study: 25.1%llms.txtPassed
An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.
- study: 93.4%AI bot rulesPartly met
Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.
- study: 1.4%Content SignalsNot met
Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.
- study: 0.2%Web Bot AuthNot present
Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.
- study: 0.3%API CatalogNot met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
- study: 11.8%OAuth discoveryNot met
Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.
- study: 10.3%OAuth Protected ResourceNot met
Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.
- study: 0.0%auth.mdNot met
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
- study: 0.2%MCP Server CardNot met
Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.
- study: 0.1%A2A Agent CardNot met
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
- study: 0.2%Agent SkillsNot met
Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.
- study: 33.7%WebMCPCould not check
Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.
- study: 0.1%ARD manifestNot met
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
Score 36 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.elfcosmetics.com · 2,047 companies scanned
6 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.
These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.
Show the 14 checksHide them
- Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
- PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
- Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
- Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
- Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
- PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
- Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
- Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
- PassedOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
- PassedOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
- Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
- Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.
- GPTBotpartly
- ClaudeBotpartly
- Anthropic-AIpartly
- Google-Extendedpartly
- Applebot-Extendedpartly
- Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
- FacebookBotpartly
- Bytespiderpartly
- CCBotpartly
- Diffbotpartly
- Omgilibotpartly
- OAI-SearchBotpartly
- Claude-SearchBotpartly
- PerplexityBotpartly
- Applebotpartly
- Amazonbotpartly
- YouBotpartly
- ChatGPT-Userpartly
- Claude-Userpartly
- Perplexity-Userpartly
- DuckAssistBotpartly
- MistralAI-Userpartly
Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.
How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers
In the study as Consumer brands.
- Which affordable vegan serums work for brightening dull skin?
- How to fix patchiness when applying cruelty-free foundation?
- Alternatives to mainstream makeup for cruelty-free and vegan choices on a budget?
- Top cruelty-free skincare for sensitive skin under $20 in the US?
- How much should I expect to pay for vegan skincare staples like cleansers and moisturizers?
- Best vegan and cruelty-free options for natural-looking everyday makeup?
- Are affordable cruelty-free skincare products as effective as mid-range options?
- Is it worth buying budget-friendly vegan lipsticks for daily use?
- What are some wallet-friendly substitutes for high-end vegan foundation?
- Vegan foundation vs mineral foundation: Which is better for acne-prone skin?
- What is a typical price range for cruelty-free makeup sets in the US?
- Which inclusive shade ranges are available from cruelty-free makeup brands?
- What are the best affordable vegan makeup brands for dry skin?
- Difference between drugstore vegan mascaras and high-end cruelty-free mascaras?
- Why does my vegan concealer crease under my eyes?
Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.
A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.
<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/elfcosmetics.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/elfcosmetics.com.svg" alt="Overall score 43 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>