Back to the study

doTerra

doterra.com · Consumer goods

Ranked 1,535 of 2,047 companies in the study

27Overall score
  • Visibility8
  • Citations1
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness21
What this means for doTerra

AI assistants rarely name doTerra, appearing in 2 of 60 answers. Young Living and Plant Therapy are also named in those answers. doTerra's overall score is 27 out of 100, ranking 1,535th of 2,047 companies. Its website passes 3 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the consumer goods market: none named doTerra. AI assistants named it in 2 of 60 answers (3.3%). The typical consumer goods company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, doTerra ranks 56 of 118 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
3.3%
2 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
15.4%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
75 of 118
by overall score, where the typical consumer goods company scores 30
How doTerra compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
8

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
1

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with consumer goods

118 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score27
Ranks 75 of 118. Typical company: 30
Named in answers3%
Ranks 56 of 118. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness21
Ranks 53 of 118. Typical company: 21
What Claude actually said

An answer that names the company

“What is the typical price range for high-quality essential oil blends in the US?”

I'll search for current pricing information on high-quality essential oil blends in the US.Let me search for more specific retail pricing information for high-quality blends.Let me search for more specific pricing from major brands like doTERRA and Young Living.Based on my search results, I can provide you with information about the typical price range for high-quality essential oil blends in the US:

Price Range Overview

Essential oil blends typically have a selling price range of $10-$20 for standard retail products. However, premium and luxury brands command higher prices.

Brand-Spe …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Young Living2Plant Therapy2
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Plant Therapy
37.5%
doTerra
25.0%
Young Living
25.0%
Rocky Mountain Oils
12.5%
Edens Garden
0.0%
Aura Cacia
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
1/15
OpenAI
1/15
Gemini
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent buy here?

Not by itself. doTerra publishes none of the purchase protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the checkout like a person.

  • UCPNot present
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.doterra.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

healthline.com
29
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
17
organicaromas.com
13
newdirectionsaromatics.com
11
justdial.com
10
hopkinsmedicine.org
8
planttherapy.com
8
amazon.com
8
webmd.com
8
draxe.com
8

In the study as Large private companies.

Every question, and where the company came up (1 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Are wellness supplements more affordable when purchased in bundles?
  • Which natural wellness products support immune health effectively?
  • Is investing in organic essential oils for skin care worth the price?
  • What are the best pure essential oils for stress relief at home?
  • What is the typical price range for high-quality essential oil blends in the US?
  • Alternatives to synthetic cleaning products for a healthier home?
  • Why does my essential oil diffuser stop working after a few minutes?
  • What are some natural alternatives to traditional air fresheners?
  • Which pure essential oils are recommended for seasonal changes and allergies?
  • Ways to use essential oils safely around babies and children?
  • What should I do if essential oils irritate my skin?
  • Essential oil singles vs blends: what's better for personal aromatherapy?
  • How do wellness supplements compare to using essential oils for daily energy?
  • How can aromatherapy be used to promote relaxation before bedtime?
  • Do natural wellness products really make a difference in sleep quality?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo