Back to the study

Devon Energy

devonenergy.com · Energy · DVN

Ranked 1,242 of 2,047 companies in the study

30Overall score
  • Visibility8
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment67
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness7
What this means for Devon Energy

AI assistants rarely name Devon Energy, mentioning it in 2 of 60 answers. In those cases, they also name EOG Resources and Coterra Energy. Its overall score is 30 out of 100, ranking 1,242nd of 2,047 companies. The website passes 1 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the energy market: none named Devon Energy. AI assistants named it in 2 of 60 answers (3.3%). The typical energy company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, Devon Energy ranks 52 of 109 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
3.3%
2 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
15.4%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
1/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
49 of 109
by overall score, where the typical energy company scores 29
How Devon Energy compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
8

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
67

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
7

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with energy

109 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score30
Ranks 49 of 109. Typical company: 29
Named in answers3%
Ranks 52 of 109. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness7
Ranks 99 of 109. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“What are the best independent oil and natural gas exploration companies operating in the U.S.?”

Identifying the "best" independent oil and natural gas exploration companies can depend on various factors such as reserves, production, revenue, and growth potential. Here are some of the prominent independent oil and natural gas exploration companies operating in the U.S.:

Top Independent US Oil & Gas Exploration Companies:

ConocoPhillips: A leading independent exploration and production company, ConocoPhillips focuses on efficiently extracting oil and natural gas. They are committed to meeting energy demand sustainably and advancing key projects.

EQT Corporation: …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
EOG Resources2Coterra Energy1
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

EOG Resources
50.0%
Devon Energy
25.0%
Occidental Petroleum (Oxy)
12.5%
Coterra Energy
12.5%
Pioneer Natural Resources
0.0%
APA Corporation (Apache)
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
1/15
Perplexity
1/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
0 of 100
  • robots.txtNot met

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
0 of 100
  • AI bot rulesNot met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 0 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.devonenergy.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

simplywall.st
16
eia.gov
15
jpt.spe.org
13
hartenergy.com
11
finance.yahoo.com
11
aogr.com
10
marketbeat.com
9
investopedia.com
7
energy.gov
6
domesticoperating.com
6

In the study as S&P 500.

Every question, and where the company came up (1 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What are the main renewable energy options compared to traditional hydrocarbon production in the U.S.?
  • Differences between upstream and midstream energy companies in the U.S. market
  • How are acreage prices determined in core U.S. shale basins like the Delaware or Midland?
  • What are common challenges faced by operators in the Permian Basin?
  • What drives fluctuations in U.S. natural gas production costs?
  • How does shale oil exploration compare to conventional oil extraction in terms of efficiency and cost?
  • What strategies help independent producers maximize recovery rates from tight oil plays?
  • Alternatives to investing in oil and gas exploration for energy sector exposure
  • How do institutional investors evaluate potential partners in the U.S. oil and gas sector?
  • Top factors to consider when choosing a U.S. oil and gas production partner
  • What are the best independent oil and natural gas exploration companies operating in the U.S.?
  • How can oil and gas E&P companies improve environmental stewardship to address regulatory compliance?
  • Is investing in U.S. independent oil exploration companies worth it in 2024?
  • What are the risks and rewards of allocating capital to unconventional oil and gas producers?
  • Other ways to gain exposure to the U.S. energy market aside from direct E&P investments
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo