Back to the study

Designer Brands

designerbrands.com · Retail · DSW

Ranked 1,990 of 2,047 companies in the study

22Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality67
  • AI readiness14
What this means for Designer Brands

AI assistants do not name Designer Brands in any of their 60 answers, while the typical company in the retail sector is named in 6.7% of answers. Designer Brands has an overall score of 22 out of 100 and ranks 1,990th of 2,047. Its website passes 2 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the retail market: none named Designer Brands. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical retail company is named in 6.7% of answers. By how often it is named, Designer Brands ranks 503 of 640 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
606 of 640
by overall score, where the typical retail company scores 34
How Designer Brands compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
67

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
14

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with retail

640 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score22
Ranks 606 of 640. Typical company: 34
Named in answers0%
Ranks 503 of 640. Typical company: 7%
AI readiness14
Ranks 503 of 640. Typical company: 29
What Gemini actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“Alternatives to luxury shoes for people seeking affordable style”

For those seeking affordable yet stylish alternatives to luxury shoes, numerous brands and strategies can help you achieve a chic look without breaking the bank.

Affordable Brands for Stylish Shoes:

Many brands offer on-trend and quality footwear at accessible price points. Some popular options include:

For Trendy and Classic Styles: Aldo, Steve Madden, Zara, H&M, and Madewell are often recommended for their fashionable and versatile selections.

For Sneakers & Streetwear: Vans, Converse, Adidas, Nike, and Puma offer a wide range of stylish and budget-friendly sneakers. R …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

DSW (Designer Shoe Warehouse)
66.7%
Shoe Carnival
33.3%
Designer Brands
0.0%
Famous Footwear
0.0%
Rack Room Shoes
0.0%
Shoe Show
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent buy here?

Not by itself. Designer Brands publishes none of the purchase protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the checkout like a person.

  • UCPNot present
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
72 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPartly met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 24 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · designerbrands.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

justdial.com
32
whowhatwear.com
15
thegoodtrade.com
14
alibaba.com
13
businessinsider.com
12
harpersbazaar.com
9
forbes.com
8
tradeindia.com
7
runrepeat.com
7
reddit.com
6

In the study as Consumer brands.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Best footwear options for people on their feet all day
  • Alternatives to luxury shoes for people seeking affordable style
  • What types of shoes are recommended for formal events in the US?
  • Good substitutes for leather shoes for those with vegan preferences
  • What can I do if my new sneakers are causing blisters?
  • Is it better to buy premium footwear online or in stores?
  • Which footwear categories offer the best value for budget-conscious shoppers?
  • Are designer shoes worth the higher price tag compared to mainstream brands?
  • How do you fix squeaky soles on a new pair of leather shoes?
  • What are some eco-friendly footwear options available in the United States?
  • What are the best shoes for expressing personal style this season?
  • Leather boots vs synthetic boots for winter—pros and cons
  • Top footwear trends in the US for fashion-conscious shoppers
  • How much should I expect to pay for high-quality designer heels?
  • Athletic shoes vs casual sneakers: which are better for everyday wear?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo