- Visibility14
- Citations1
- Sentiment50
- Site quality87
- AI readiness21
AI assistants name California Resources in 5% of answers, which is a bit more often than the typical company in the energy sector. Its overall score is 31 out of 100, ranking 1,146th of 2,047 companies. The company’s website passes 3 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.
We asked 15 unbranded questions about the energy market: none named California Resources. AI assistants named it in 3 of 60 answers (5.0%). The typical energy company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, California Resources ranks 44 of 109 in its sector.
Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.
This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named
Five parts, each scored out of 100.
How often AI assistants name the company
How often AI uses the company's own website as a source
How positively AI describes the company
How well built the website's own pages are
How easily AI tools can read and use the website
Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.
109 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.
An answer that names the company
“What are the best carbon capture and storage projects currently operating in California?”
Based on the search results, here's information about carbon capture and storage projects currently operating in California:
Carbon TerraVault I (CTV I)
Carbon TerraVault I, located at California Resources Corporation's (CRC) Elk Hills Field in Kern County, is now the state's first operational carbon capture and storage facility. The first CO2 injection at CTV I took place in May 2026.
The project captures carbon dioxide from CRC's cryogenic gas plant and injects it into depleted oil and natural gas reservoirs more than a mile below the surface for long-term storage. At full capacity, th …
The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.
How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals
Answers naming it, out of answers received
What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.
- Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical teamHide the checks
- study: 92.0%robots.txtPassed
A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.
- study: 86.8%SitemapPartly met
Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.
- study: 0.3%Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
- study: 5.5%DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present
Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.
- study: 1.9%Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
- study: 25.1%llms.txtNot met
Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.
- study: 93.4%AI bot rulesPassed
Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.
- study: 1.4%Content SignalsNot met
Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.
- study: 0.2%Web Bot AuthNot present
Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.
- study: 0.3%API CatalogNot met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
- study: 11.8%OAuth discoveryNot met
Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.
- study: 10.3%OAuth Protected ResourceNot met
Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.
- study: 0.0%auth.mdNot met
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
- study: 0.2%MCP Server CardCould not check
Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.
- study: 0.1%A2A Agent CardCould not check
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
- study: 0.2%Agent SkillsCould not check
Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.
- study: 33.7%WebMCPCould not check
Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.
- study: 0.1%ARD manifestCould not check
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
Score 38 of 100 · 79% of checks could run · checked on October 4, 2026 · www.crc.com · 2,047 companies scanned
3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.
These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.
Show the 14 checksHide them
- Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
- PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
- Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
- Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
- Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
- PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
- Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
- Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
- Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
- Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
- Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
- Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
This website sets rules for 1 AI crawler by name. All others follow its general rules.
- GPTBotpartly
- ClaudeBotpartly
- Anthropic-AIpartly
- Google-Extendedpartly
- Applebot-Extendedpartly
- Meta-ExternalAgent*blocked
- FacebookBotpartly
- Bytespiderpartly
- CCBotpartly
- Diffbotpartly
- Omgilibotpartly
- OAI-SearchBotpartly
- Claude-SearchBotpartly
- PerplexityBotpartly
- Applebotpartly
- Amazonbotpartly
- YouBotpartly
- ChatGPT-Userpartly
- Claude-Userpartly
- Perplexity-Userpartly
- DuckAssistBotpartly
- MistralAI-Userpartly
Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.
How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers
In the study as US-listed.
- What are the best carbon capture and storage projects currently operating in California?
- What are common challenges faced during the implementation of large-scale carbon capture facilities?
- Is investing in carbon capture and storage projects a good long-term strategy for sustainability-focused investors?
- How much does it cost to integrate carbon capture storage with existing energy production infrastructure in the US?
- What are the typical price ranges for sustainable energy production services in California?
- Why might a carbon storage project struggle to meet California’s environmental standards?
- Are sustainable energy production services in California worth the higher cost for businesses aiming to lower their carbon footprint?
- How can industrial facilities benefit from integrating carbon capture solutions into their operations?
- What are some alternatives to geological carbon storage for managing industrial CO2 emissions?
- What are typical applications for captured CO2 in the energy sector?
- What is the difference between point-source carbon capture and direct air capture technologies?
- What other carbon mitigation strategies can businesses use besides carbon capture and storage?
- Which energy producers in the US focus most on sustainable practices?
- Which renewable energy sources are most commonly used as alternatives to fossil-fuel-based energy production in California?
- How does natural gas compare to oil for reducing carbon emissions in energy production?
Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.
A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.
<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/crc.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/crc.com.svg" alt="Overall score 31 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>