Back to the study

Core & Main

coreandmain.com · Industrial · CNM

Ranked 599 of 2,047 companies in the study

38Overall score
  • Visibility7
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment100
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness29
What this means for Core & Main

AI assistants rarely name Core & Main in their answers, mentioning it in 2 of 60 responses and sometimes also naming Ferguson Waterworks. This is less often than the typical company in the Industrial sector. Its overall score is 38 out of 100, ranking 599th of 2,047 companies. The website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named Core & Main. AI assistants named it in 2 of 60 answers (3.3%). The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Core & Main ranks 138 of 246 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
3.3%
2 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
13.3%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
53 of 246
by overall score, where the typical industrial company scores 31
How Core & Main compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
7

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with industrial

246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score38
Ranks 53 of 246. Typical company: 31
Named in answers3%
Ranks 138 of 246. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness29
Ranks 34 of 246. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“What are the best suppliers for municipal water and wastewater infrastructure products in the US?”

When seeking suppliers for municipal water and wastewater infrastructure products in the U.S., several key companies stand out for their comprehensive offerings and national reach. These suppliers provide a wide range of products and services, from pipes and valves to advanced treatment technologies and smart metering solutions.

Some of the best suppliers in this sector include:

Core & Main: This company is a leading specialized distributor of water, wastewater, storm drainage, and fire protection products and related services across the United States and Canada. They offer solutions …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Ferguson Waterworks4
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Ferguson Waterworks
40.0%
HD Supply Waterworks (now part of Ferguson)
40.0%
Core & Main
20.0%
WinWater Works
0.0%
Municipal Water Works Supply (MWWS)
0.0%
Lynch Supply
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
1/15
Perplexity
1/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · coreandmain.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

epa.gov
18
blog.qrfs.com
11
blazemaster.com
7
fluencecorp.com
7
youtube.com
6
image-ppubs.uspto.gov
6
mcwaneductile.com
6
assets.ctfassets.net
6
apps.ecology.wa.gov
5
muellerwaterproducts.com
5

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (1 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Selecting appropriate storm drainage solutions for flood-prone areas
  • What are the best suppliers for municipal water and wastewater infrastructure products in the US?
  • Alternatives to traditional gravity-fed wastewater systems for rural communities
  • Substitutes for precast concrete drainage structures in municipal projects
  • How do costs compare between galvanized steel and HDPE piping for storm drainage?
  • Water meter technologies: ultrasonic vs. mechanical for utility upgrades
  • Top-rated storm drainage solutions for cities and utilities
  • Common issues with fire hydrant installations and how to resolve them
  • Is it worth investing in pre-assembled valve packages for large municipal projects?
  • Pipe material options for fire protection systems: ductile iron vs. PVC vs. steel
  • How to evaluate the quality of stormwater management products for public works projects
  • What can cause frequent leaks in water distribution mains and how do you fix them?
  • Typical price range for bulk water and sewer pipe supply in the US
  • Best products for upgrading aging wastewater systems in small towns
  • What are the best non-metallic options for fire protection piping?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo