Back to the study

Coca-Cola Consolidated

cokeconsolidated.com · Consumer goods · COKE

Ranked 1,228 of 2,047 companies in the study

30Overall score
  • Visibility15
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness29
What this means for Coca-Cola Consolidated

AI assistants name Coca-Cola Consolidated in 5% of answers, a bit more often than the typical consumer goods company at 3.3%. Its overall score is 30 out of 100, ranking 1,228th of 2,047. The website passes 2 out of 14 technical checks that measure how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the consumer goods market: none named Coca-Cola Consolidated. AI assistants named it in 3 of 60 answers (5.0%). The typical consumer goods company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, Coca-Cola Consolidated ranks 50 of 118 in its sector.

Named by AI in
5.0%
3 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
30.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
56 of 118
by overall score, where the typical consumer goods company scores 30
How Coca-Cola Consolidated compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
15

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with consumer goods

118 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score30
Ranks 56 of 118. Typical company: 30
Named in answers5%
Ranks 50 of 118. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness29
Ranks 24 of 118. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“Pricing differences between multi-brand beverage bottlers and exclusive bottlers”

The pricing differences between multi-brand beverage bottlers and exclusive bottlers are largely influenced by the power dynamics within the beverage industry supply chain, cost structures, economies of scale, and contractual agreements.

1. Power Dynamics and Control:

Concentrate Producers' Power: Companies that produce the beverage concentrate (e.g., Coca-Cola, PepsiCo) generally hold more power than bottlers. They own the proprietary formulas and brands, which are the core value of the product and drive consumer loyalty.

Contractual Control: Concentrate producers often e …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Coca-Cola Consolidated
60.0%
Keurig Dr Pepper Bottling Company
40.0%
Pepsi Bottling Ventures
0.0%
Buffalo Rock Company
0.0%
Honickman Companies
0.0%
Swire Coca-Cola, USA
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
3/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
31 of 100
  • robots.txtNot met

    Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPartly met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
0 of 100
  • AI bot rulesNot met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 7 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.cokeconsolidated.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

investors.coca-colacompany.com
13
buske.com
11
feeds.metrowholesalesd.com
11
justdial.com
10
bevsource.com
8
umbrex.com
8
beveragetradenetwork.com
6
alibaba.com
6
premiumwaters.com
6
nextbillion.ai
6

In the study as Consumer brands.

Every question, and where the company came up (3 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What factors should I consider when choosing a beverage distribution partner for a multi-location restaurant chain?
  • What are some common beverage distribution options for large event venues?
  • What should I do if my beverage delivery arrives with damaged packaging?
  • Is it cost-effective to work with a local beverage bottling company for community events?
  • Bulk beverage distribution vs small-scale delivery: which is better for offices?
  • How does direct store delivery compare to warehouse delivery for beverage distribution?
  • Pricing differences between multi-brand beverage bottlers and exclusive bottlers
  • How can an office set up ongoing beverage delivery for employees?
  • Alternatives to traditional beverage bottling companies for small businesses
  • Best regional beverage distributors for supplying entertainment venues with a variety of drinks
  • How to handle inconsistencies in beverage supply schedules from distributors
  • Average pricing for wholesale beverage distribution to US retailers
  • What are the most reliable beverage bottling and distribution partners for restaurants in the US?
  • Are full-service beverage distributors worth it for small retailers?
  • What are the alternatives to full-service beverage distribution for independent retailers?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 30 of 100 badge for Coca-Cola Consolidated

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/cokeconsolidated.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/cokeconsolidated.com.svg" alt="Overall score 30 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo