Back to the study

Cogent Communications

cogentco.com · Telecom · CCOI

Ranked 1,886 of 2,047 companies in the study

24Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness14
What this means for Cogent Communications

AI assistants do not name Cogent Communications in any of their 60 answers. The company has an overall score of 24 out of 100, ranking 1,886th of 2,047. Its website passes 2 of the 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the telecom market: none named Cogent Communications. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical telecom company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Cogent Communications ranks 31 of 41 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
36 of 41
by overall score, where the typical telecom company scores 30
How Cogent Communications compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
14

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with telecom

41 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score24
Ranks 36 of 41. Typical company: 30
Named in answers0%
Ranks 31 of 41. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness14
Ranks 36 of 41. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“Recommended internet services for supporting large-scale video streaming platforms”

For supporting large-scale video streaming platforms, a combination of robust internet services and infrastructure is crucial. Here's a breakdown of recommended services:

1. Content Delivery Networks (CDNs)

CDNs are fundamental for large-scale video streaming. They are distributed networks of servers designed to deliver video content (live and video-on-demand) with low latency and minimal buffering by caching content closer to the end-user.

How they work: When a viewer requests a video, the CDN routes them to the nearest "edge" server. If the server has the content cached, it del …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Named instead
Zayo2Verizon Business2
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Verizon Business
52.2%
AT&T Business
30.4%
Lumen Technologies
13.0%
Zayo
4.3%
Cogent Communications
0.0%
Crown Castle
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
41 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 16 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · cogentco.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

verizon.com
30
highspeedinternet.com
20
business.com
18
business.att.com
18
spectrum.com
15
broadbandnow.com
15
business.comcast.com
10
business.org
9
thenetworkinstallers.com
8
cox.com
8

In the study as Consumer brands.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Is upgrading to enterprise internet connectivity worth the cost for a growing business?
  • Recommended internet services for supporting large-scale video streaming platforms
  • Direct internet access vs IP transit for carriers
  • How to troubleshoot slow speeds on a dedicated business line
  • Most reliable colocation services for content providers
  • What to consider when choosing a business ISP for nationwide offices?
  • Fiber-optic connectivity vs cable for small offices
  • How to evaluate business VPN services for remote teams
  • Best connectivity solutions for content distribution networks
  • Typical pricing tiers for enterprise fiber-optic internet in the US
  • Business internet vs dedicated transport solutions: What’s the difference?
  • Alternatives to traditional business ISPs for carriers and content providers
  • Common issues with fiber internet connections for businesses and how to fix them
  • Top options for enterprise-level VPN connectivity services
  • Best fiber-optic internet providers for medium-sized businesses in the US
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo