Back to the study

Codexis

codexis.com · Industrial · CDXS

Ranked 266 of 2,047 companies in the study

42Overall score
  • Visibility17
  • Citations5
  • Sentiment100
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness29
What this means for Codexis

AI assistants name Codexis in 6.7% of answers, which is slightly more often than the typical company in its sector. Codexis has an overall score of 42 out of 100, ranking 266th of 2,047 companies. Its website passes 4 out of 14 technical checks measuring how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named Codexis. AI assistants named it in 4 of 60 answers (6.7%). The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Codexis ranks 97 of 246 in its sector.

Named by AI in
6.7%
4 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
33.3%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
17 of 246
by overall score, where the typical industrial company scores 31
How Codexis compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
17

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
5

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
100

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with industrial

246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score42
Ranks 17 of 246. Typical company: 31
Named in answers7%
Ranks 97 of 246. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness29
Ranks 34 of 246. Typical company: 21
What Claude actually said

An answer that names the company

“Alternatives to traditional RNA synthesis for large-scale therapeutic manufacturing”

I'll search for information about alternatives to traditional RNA synthesis for therapeutic manufacturing.Based on recent advances in the field, here are the main alternatives to traditional RNA synthesis for large-scale therapeutic manufacturing:

Enzyme-Enabled Oligonucleotide Synthesis

Enzyme-enabled oligonucleotide synthesis is widely regarded as the alternative for industrial scale production of RNA therapeutics, with enzymatic workflows offering greater scalability and improved product quality and yields while largely eliminating hazardous solvents and reducing process complexity. Th …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Aldevron1TriLink BioTechnologies1
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Codexis
57.1%
Aldevron
28.6%
TriLink BioTechnologies
14.3%
AGC Biologics
0.0%
New England Biolabs (NEB)
0.0%
Genevant Sciences
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
3/15
Claude
1/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
80 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryPassed

    SVCB or HTTPS records under _agents that advertise agent endpoints.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 28 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.codexis.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
53
codexis.com (its own website)
26
pubs.acs.org
13
thermofisher.com
13
nature.com
12
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
12
sigmaaldrich.com
11
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
9
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
9
biosyn.com
8

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (3 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Common challenges in scaling up RNA manufacturing for clinical trials
  • Best practices for integrating RNA manufacturing services in therapeutic R&D
  • Alternatives to traditional RNA synthesis for large-scale therapeutic manufacturing
  • What are the best RNA manufacturing solutions for pharmaceutical applications?
  • How effective are custom enzyme solutions for improving therapeutic manufacturing?
  • Enzyme biocatalysis vs traditional chemical synthesis in drug manufacturing
  • Factors that affect the pricing of enzyme biocatalysis services for pharma
  • Typical cost range for outsourced RNA synthesis in the US
  • How to address inconsistencies in siRNA stereochemistry during synthesis
  • How to use enzyme biocatalysis for efficient oligonucleotide production
  • Are advanced RNA synthesis services worth the investment for biotech startups?
  • Top enzyme engineering options for siRNA therapeutics production
  • Non-enzymatic methods for producing therapeutic grade RNA
  • What options exist beyond chemical synthesis for custom enzyme production?
  • Custom enzyme solutions vs off-the-shelf enzymes for molecular biology uses
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 42 of 100 badge for Codexis

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/codexis.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/codexis.com.svg" alt="Overall score 42 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo