- Visibility44
- Citations0
- Sentiment50
- Site quality93
- AI readiness21
AI assistants name CME Group in 31.7% of answers, much more often than the typical company in its sector, which appears in 3.3% of answers. CME Group achieves an overall score of 42 out of 100, ranking 225th of 2,047 companies. Its website passes 1 of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.
We asked 15 unbranded questions about the finance market: none named CME Group. AI assistants named it in 19 of 60 answers (31.7%). The typical finance company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, CME Group ranks 14 of 205 in its sector.
Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.
This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named
Five parts, each scored out of 100.
How often AI assistants name the company
How often AI uses the company's own website as a source
How positively AI describes the company
How well built the website's own pages are
How easily AI tools can read and use the website
Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.
205 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.
An answer that names the company
“How can I resolve slow trade execution times on a futures trading exchange?”
I'll search for current best practices on resolving slow trade execution times on futures exchanges.Based on current best practices, here are the key strategies to resolve slow trade execution times on futures exchanges:
Diagnose the Problem
Start by identifying where slowness is located: the speed of your platform's order routing, your internet connection, or whether your broker's server routes orders directly to the exchange or holds certain orders before routing them.
Infrastructure and Network Optimization
Proximity to Exchanges:
Setting up trading servers near the CME exchan …
The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.
How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals
Answers naming it, out of answers received
What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.
- Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical teamHide the checks
- study: 92.0%robots.txtPassed
A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.
- study: 86.8%SitemapPassed
An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.
- study: 0.3%Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
- study: 5.5%DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present
Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.
- study: 1.9%Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
- study: 25.1%llms.txtNot met
Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.
- study: 93.4%AI bot rulesPassed
Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.
- study: 1.4%Content SignalsNot met
Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.
- study: 0.2%Web Bot AuthNot present
Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.
- study: 0.3%API CatalogNot met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
- study: 11.8%OAuth discoveryNot met
Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.
- study: 10.3%OAuth Protected ResourceNot met
Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.
- study: 0.0%auth.mdNot met
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
- study: 0.2%MCP Server CardNot met
Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.
- study: 0.1%A2A Agent CardNot met
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
- study: 0.2%Agent SkillsNot met
Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.
- study: 33.7%WebMCPCould not check
Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.
- study: 0.1%ARD manifestNot met
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
Score 32 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 3, 2026 · www.cmegroup.com · 2,047 companies scanned
1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.
These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.
Show the 14 checksHide them
- Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
- Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
- PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
- Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
- Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
- Not metToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
- Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
- Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
- Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
- Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
- Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
- Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers
In the study as S&P 500.
- How can I resolve slow trade execution times on a futures trading exchange?
- How do institutional investors use interest rate futures to hedge against rate volatility?
- What should I do if my margin requirements change unexpectedly on a derivatives platform?
- What are the best futures exchanges for managing commodity price risk in the US?
- What are common strategies for corporations to manage currency risk with options contracts?
- What types of energy derivatives can be traded on US financial exchanges?
- How are transaction fees structured on US-based derivatives trading exchanges?
- What alternatives exist to central clearinghouse platforms for risk management in futures trading?
- How do electronic derivatives exchanges compare to traditional open outcry markets?
- What are typical costs involved in using an electronic futures market for large institutional trades?
- Futures trading platform vs options trading platform—what’s the difference for risk management?
- Is it better to use a specialized risk management exchange or a general purpose trading platform for hedging?
- Which platforms offer a wide range of interest rate derivatives for institutional traders?
- Are there non-exchange methods for managing exposure to commodity price swings?
- Are integrated clearing and settlement solutions for derivatives trading worth the extra cost?
Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.
A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.
<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/cmegroup.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/cmegroup.com.svg" alt="Overall score 42 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>