Back to the study

CKE Restaurants

ckr.com · Consumer goods

Ranked 1,882 of 2,047 companies in the study

24Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness14
What this means for CKE Restaurants

AI assistants do not name CKE Restaurants in any of their 60 market answers. CKE Restaurants has an overall score of 24 out of 100, ranking 1,882nd of 2,047 companies. Its website passes 2 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the consumer goods market: none named CKE Restaurants. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical consumer goods company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, CKE Restaurants ranks 77 of 118 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
107 of 118
by overall score, where the typical consumer goods company scores 30
How CKE Restaurants compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
14

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with consumer goods

118 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score24
Ranks 107 of 118. Typical company: 30
Named in answers0%
Ranks 77 of 118. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness14
Ranks 94 of 118. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“Best quick-service restaurant chains for families on a budget”

Many quick-service restaurant chains offer excellent value and family-friendly options for those on a budget. These establishments often feature special meal deals, kids-eat-free promotions, or affordable family bundles that can significantly cut down dining costs.

Some of the best quick-service restaurant chains for families on a budget include:

Pizza & Italian:

Cici's Pizza Known for its all-you-can-eat pizza buffet, Cici's allows kids under 3 to eat free and offers discounted prices for children aged 3-11.

Fazoli's This Italian fast-casual restaurant offers "fast, fres …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Named instead
McDonald's18Burger King11Wendy's7Jack in the Box4Sonic Drive-In2
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

McDonald's
42.9%
Burger King
26.2%
Wendy's
16.7%
Jack in the Box
9.5%
Sonic Drive-In
4.8%
CKE Restaurants
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
41 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 16 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.ckr.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

qsrmagazine.com
21
nrn.com
21
franchise.eatbreadless.com
18
jackintheboxfranchising.com
18
franchisedirect.com
16
dtiq.com
16
indianretailer.com
15
smallbiztrends.com
9
penn-station.com
9
waybackburgers.com
9

In the study as Consumer brands.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Best quick-service restaurant chains for families on a budget
  • Common challenges franchisees face in the quick-service restaurant industry
  • Alternatives to opening a traditional quick-service restaurant franchise
  • How do quick-service restaurants address staffing shortages?
  • Quick-service restaurant franchise versus independent diner: pros and cons for owners
  • Is owning a quick-service restaurant franchise worth the investment in today's market?
  • What is the average initial investment for a quick-service restaurant franchise in the US?
  • How do royalty fees typically work for quick-service restaurant franchises?
  • What are some lower-cost options than standard quick-service restaurant franchises?
  • What are the most popular quick-service restaurant franchises in the United States?
  • Best quick-service restaurant franchise options for small towns
  • What should I look for before investing in a quick-service food franchise?
  • Top quick-service restaurant chains offering plant-based menu items
  • How do quick-service restaurants compare to fast-casual restaurants in terms of menu options and speed?
  • Ways quick-service restaurants can adapt to increase drive-thru efficiency
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo