- Visibility32
- Citations0
- Sentiment50
- Site quality80
- AI readiness43
AI assistants name ChatGPT in 36.7% of answers, which is more often than the typical company in the technology sector. Its overall score is 38 out of 100, ranking 524th of 2,047 companies. ChatGPT's website passes 5 of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.
We asked 15 unbranded questions about the technology market: none named ChatGPT. AI assistants named it in 22 of 60 answers (36.7%). The typical technology company is named in 10.0% of answers. By how often it is named, ChatGPT ranks 37 of 273 in its sector.
Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.
This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named
Five parts, each scored out of 100.
How often AI assistants name the company
How often AI uses the company's own website as a source
How positively AI describes the company
How well built the website's own pages are
How easily AI tools can read and use the website
Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.
273 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.
An answer that names the company
“Best ways to use an AI assistant for managing everyday work tasks?”
AI assistants can significantly enhance productivity by automating routine tasks, managing information, and streamlining workflows. The most effective ways to use them involve integrating them into your existing work processes and leveraging their capabilities for specific needs.
Here are some of the best ways to use an AI assistant for managing everyday work tasks:
1. Task Management and Scheduling:
Automated Scheduling: AI assistants like Motion and Reclaim.ai can automatically schedule your tasks and meetings, protecting focus time and adjusting your schedule when plans change …
The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.
How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals
Answers naming it, out of answers received
What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.
- Content Signals
The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.
Show every check, for your technical teamHide the checks
- study: 92.0%robots.txtPassed
A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.
- study: 86.8%SitemapPassed
An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.
- study: 0.3%Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
- study: 5.5%DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present
Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.
- study: 1.9%Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
- study: 25.1%llms.txtNot met
Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.
- study: 93.4%AI bot rulesPartly met
Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.
- study: 1.4%Content SignalsNot met
Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.
- study: 0.2%Web Bot AuthPassed
A key directory other sites can use to verify requests from your own agents.
- study: 0.3%API CatalogNot met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
- study: 11.8%OAuth discoveryNot met
Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.
- study: 10.3%OAuth Protected ResourceNot met
Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.
- study: 0.0%auth.mdNot met
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
- study: 0.2%MCP Server CardNot met
Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.
- study: 0.1%A2A Agent CardNot met
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
- study: 0.2%Agent SkillsNot met
Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.
- study: 33.7%WebMCPPassed
Tools registered in the browser through navigator.modelContext.
- study: 0.1%ARD manifestNot met
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
Score 30 of 100 · 100% of checks could run · checked on October 3, 2026 · chatgpt.com · 2,047 companies scanned
5 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.
These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.
Show the 14 checksHide them
- Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
- PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
- PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
- Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
- Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
- PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
- PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
- Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
- Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
- Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
- Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
- Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
This website sets rules for 7 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.
- GPTBotpartly
- ClaudeBotpartly
- Anthropic-AI*blocked
- Google-Extended*blocked
- Applebot-Extendedpartly
- Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
- FacebookBot*blocked
- Bytespider*blocked
- CCBot*blocked
- Diffbotpartly
- Omgilibot*blocked
- OAI-SearchBotpartly
- Claude-SearchBotpartly
- PerplexityBot*blocked
- Applebotpartly
- Amazonbotpartly
- YouBotpartly
- ChatGPT-Userpartly
- Claude-Userpartly
- Perplexity-Userpartly
- DuckAssistBotpartly
- MistralAI-Userpartly
Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.
How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers
In the study as Consumer brands. One of the most visited websites in the United States (Similarweb, August 2026). An OpenAI product.
- Best ways to use an AI assistant for managing everyday work tasks?
- Is using an AI assistant for coding and homework tasks really worth the investment?
- What are some alternatives to interactive AI chat platforms for content creation?
- What are the best AI writing assistants for students looking to improve productivity?
- Are there affordable AI tools that support both text and image generation?
- Alternatives to AI coding assistants for beginners learning to program?
- How can AI question-answering tools help with research assignments?
- Do paid AI productivity platforms offer significant advantages over free ones?
- Which tools can help professionals automate content creation tasks using AI?
- Best non-AI options for organizing and streamlining office productivity tasks?
- What can I do if my AI-powered image generator is not processing my files correctly?
- AI-powered chat platforms vs. image creation tools: which is better for creative projects?
- How does an AI content generator compare to traditional productivity software for brainstorming?
- How much do AI productivity platforms typically cost per month in the US?
- Why might my AI chat tool stop unexpectedly or fail to generate an answer?
Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.
A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.
<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/chatgpt.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/chatgpt.com.svg" alt="Overall score 38 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>