Back to the study

Centerfield

centerfield.com · Media

Ranked 1,577 of 2,047 companies in the study

27Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Centerfield

AI assistants do not name Centerfield in any of the 60 answers about the media market. The company has an overall score of 27 out of 100, ranking 1,577th of 2,047 companies in the study. Its website passes 3 out of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the media market: none named Centerfield. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical media company is named in 15.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Centerfield ranks 80 of 99 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
82 of 99
by overall score, where the typical media company scores 36
How Centerfield compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with media

99 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score27
Ranks 82 of 99. Typical company: 36
Named in answers0%
Ranks 80 of 99. Typical company: 15%
AI readiness21
Ranks 53 of 99. Typical company: 29
What OpenAI actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“What are the best AI-powered marketing platforms for improving digital advertising ROI?”

Good question — AI can meaningfully lift digital ad ROI, but the “best” platform depends on your channels, budget, and whether you need full autonomous media-buying or AI for specific tasks (creative, bidding, reporting). I looked up current product capabilities and recent vendor announcements to make sure recommendations are up‑to‑date. Below are top AI‑powered marketing platforms you should evaluate, with quick notes on what they do best and when to pick each.

Top AI‑powered platforms (what they are best at)

Google Ads (Performance Max / AI Max)

Strengths: Native, cross‑channel automa …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Kenshoo (now Skai)
100.0%
Centerfield
0.0%
QuinStreet
0.0%
Digital Media Solutions (DMS)
0.0%
Zeta Global
0.0%
Perform[cb]
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · centerfield.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

blog.hubspot.com
15
vendasta.com
14
digiday.com
11
braze.com
8
pipeline.zoominfo.com
8
fueler.io
8
searchenginejournal.com
8
madgicx.com
8
criteo.com
7
aidigital.com
7

In the study as Consumer brands.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What are some non-AI strategies to scale paid media campaigns for US businesses?
  • AI customer acquisition platform alternatives for brands with smaller advertising budgets?
  • How much does it cost to access closed-loop measurement and paid media performance platforms?
  • Typical pricing models for AI-driven customer acquisition solutions in the US market?
  • How can a proprietary AI network help optimize affiliate marketing results?
  • Common issues that cause low conversion rates on AI-driven acquisition platforms?
  • AI marketing platforms vs data-driven affiliate solutions: which delivers higher ROI?
  • Ways to use AI discovery tools to increase e-commerce sales in the United States?
  • Top customer acquisition tools using AI technology for US-based brands?
  • What should US brands look for when choosing an AI-powered customer acquisition solution?
  • Is investing in an AI marketing platform worth it for growing businesses?
  • Alternatives to AI-powered marketing platforms for digital customer acquisition?
  • Why aren't my digital marketing campaigns reaching the right audience with current AI platforms?
  • How does an AI-driven customer acquisition platform compare to traditional marketing agencies?
  • What are the best AI-powered marketing platforms for improving digital advertising ROI?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo