- Visibility0
- Citations0
- Sentiment50
- Site quality80
- AI readiness43
AI assistants do not name Carelu in any of their answers to questions about the retail market, while the typical company in this sector is named in 6.7% of answers. Carelu's overall score is 28 out of 100, ranking 1,459th of 2,047 companies. Its website passes 5 of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.
We asked 15 unbranded questions about the retail market: none named Carelu. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical retail company is named in 6.7% of answers. By how often it is named, Carelu ranks 503 of 640 in its sector.
Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.
Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.
This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named
Five parts, each scored out of 100.
How often AI assistants name the company
How often AI uses the company's own website as a source
How positively AI describes the company
How well built the website's own pages are
How easily AI tools can read and use the website
Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.
640 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.
The company is not named in this answer
“Are there cost-effective options for small ABA therapy providers seeking automated intake solutions?”
I'll search for information about cost-effective automated intake solutions for small ABA therapy providers.Yes, there are several cost-effective automated intake solutions available for small ABA therapy providers. Here's what the market offers:
Budget-Friendly Options
Theralytics is recommended for solo BCBAs or brand-new startups with a tight budget and few clients, as it's a relatively low-cost starting solution. Theralytics offers simple scheduling, basic billing, data collection, and payroll tools at a low cost and should be considered for solo BCBAs and small ABA practices that nee …
The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.
How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals
Answers naming it, out of answers received
What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.
- Content Signals
Not by itself. Carelu publishes none of the purchase protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the checkout like a person.
- UCPNot present
- ACPNot present
- AP2Not present
- x402Not present
- MPPNot present
Show every check, for your technical teamHide the checks
- study: 92.0%robots.txtPassed
A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.
- study: 86.8%SitemapPassed
An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.
- study: 0.3%Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
- study: 5.5%DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present
Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.
- study: 1.9%Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
- study: 25.1%llms.txtPassed
An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.
- study: 93.4%AI bot rulesPassed
Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.
- study: 1.4%Content SignalsNot met
Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.
- study: 0.2%Web Bot AuthNot present
Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.
- study: 0.3%API CatalogNot met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
- study: 11.8%OAuth discoveryNot met
Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.
- study: 10.3%OAuth Protected ResourceNot met
Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.
- study: 0.0%auth.mdNot met
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
- study: 0.2%MCP Server CardNot met
Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.
- study: 0.1%A2A Agent CardNot met
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
- study: 0.2%Agent SkillsNot met
Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.
- study: 33.7%WebMCPCould not check
Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.
- study: 0.1%ARD manifestNot met
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
Score 43 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · carelu.com · 2,047 companies scanned
5 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.
These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.
Show the 14 checksHide them
- Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
- PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
- Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
- Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
- Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
- PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
- PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
- Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
- Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
- Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
- Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
- Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
This website sets rules for 15 AI crawlers by name. All others follow its general rules.
- GPTBot*allowed
- ClaudeBot*allowed
- Anthropic-AI*allowed
- Google-Extended*allowed
- Applebot-Extended*allowed
- Meta-ExternalAgent*allowed
- FacebookBotpartly
- Bytespiderpartly
- CCBot*allowed
- Diffbotpartly
- Omgilibotpartly
- OAI-SearchBot*allowed
- Claude-SearchBot*allowed
- PerplexityBot*allowed
- Applebotpartly
- Amazonbot*allowed
- YouBotpartly
- ChatGPT-User*allowed
- Claude-User*allowed
- Perplexity-User*allowed
- DuckAssistBot*allowed
- MistralAI-Userpartly
Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.
How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers
In the study as US retailers: listed as a retailer in Wikidata, a public database, and among the websites Cloudflare Radar ranks as visited.
- Which features should I look for in an AI-driven patient admissions tool for behavioral health organizations?
- How does AI-powered intake software compare to traditional manual intake processes in behavioral health settings?
- Are there cost-effective options for small ABA therapy providers seeking automated intake solutions?
- What pricing models are commonly used for AI-powered patient intake platforms in the behavioral health sector?
- What are the pros and cons of fully automated intake systems versus hybrid intake workflows for therapy providers?
- How can switching to automated patient intake help behavioral health organizations scale efficiently?
- What are the best AI intake automation solutions for ABA therapy providers?
- Automated patient admissions platforms vs. standard patient forms for ABA clinics—what are the differences?
- How do leading platforms improve patient intake efficiency for ABA practices?
- How can behavioral health providers address patient drop-off during automated admissions workflows?
- How do ABA therapy practices use AI intake platforms to reduce waitlists and speed up patient onboarding?
- Why might automated patient intake systems fail to capture all necessary information for ABA clients?
- Is investing in an AI intake automation platform worth it for mid-sized ABA clinics?
- What compliance and data security measures should an AI intake tool offer for behavioral health organizations?
- What are good alternatives to AI-enabled intake automation for streamlining admissions at behavioral health practices?
Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.