Back to the study

Cardinal Health

cardinalhealth.com · Retail · CAH

Ranked 473 of 2,047 companies in the study

39Overall score
  • Visibility20
  • Citations1
  • Sentiment86
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Cardinal Health

AI assistants name Cardinal Health in 16.7% of answers, which is more often than the typical company in its sector. Its overall score is 39 out of 100, ranking 473rd of 2,047 companies. The company’s website passes 3 out of 14 technical checks for how ready it is for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the retail market: none named Cardinal Health. AI assistants named it in 10 of 60 answers (16.7%). The typical retail company is named in 6.7% of answers. By how often it is named, Cardinal Health ranks 173 of 640 in its sector.

Named by AI in
16.7%
10 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
25.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
156 of 640
by overall score, where the typical retail company scores 34
How Cardinal Health compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
20

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
1

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
86

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with retail

640 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score39
Ranks 156 of 640. Typical company: 34
Named in answers17%
Ranks 173 of 640. Typical company: 7%
AI readiness21
Ranks 351 of 640. Typical company: 29
What Claude actually said

An answer that names the company

“How do direct medical supply purchasing platforms compare to full-service healthcare distribution companies?”

I'll search for information on how direct medical supply purchasing platforms compare to traditional full-service healthcare distribution companies.Let me search for more specific information about modern direct purchasing platforms and their advantages.Based on my research, here's a comprehensive comparison of direct medical supply purchasing platforms and full-service healthcare distribution companies:

Key Differences

Full-Service Healthcare Distribution Companies:

Purchasing products directly from multiple suppliers requires healthcare providers to have multiple contacts, while ch …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Owens & Minor5McKesson3Medline Industries2
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Cardinal Health
28.6%
McKesson
22.9%
Medline Industries
22.9%
Owens & Minor
20.0%
Henry Schein Medical
5.7%
Concordance Healthcare Solutions
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
4/15
Gemini
3/15
OpenAI
2/15
Perplexity
1/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent buy here?

Not by itself. Cardinal Health publishes none of the purchase protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the checkout like a person.

  • UCPNot present
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 3, 2026 · www.cardinalhealth.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
26
sekologistics.com
13
ghx.com
12
dhl.com
12
beckershospitalreview.com
11
geodis.com
11
pharmaphorum.com
9
justdial.com
9
hida.org
8
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
8

In the study as S&P 500.

Every question, and where the company came up (4 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Difference between third-party logistics services and in-house healthcare supply chain management for hospital systems
  • How do direct medical supply purchasing platforms compare to full-service healthcare distribution companies?
  • Are healthcare logistics providers worth it for small and medium healthcare facilities?
  • What features should healthcare providers look for in a logistics partner to support patient care and compliance?
  • How to address delayed medical supply shipments in hospital logistics operations?
  • Best solutions for disaster preparedness in hospital medical supply distribution
  • Alternatives to traditional medical supply distribution for rural healthcare providers
  • What affects the pricing structure for hospital medical supply distribution services?
  • What are the best medical supply distributors for hospitals seeking cost-effective solutions in the United States?
  • How can healthcare providers increase quality of patient care through integrated supply chain management?
  • Top healthcare logistics providers that help health systems improve efficiency and reduce operating costs
  • Typical cost ranges for healthcare logistics services for large hospital networks
  • Should hospitals use a medical supply distributor or purchase directly from manufacturers?
  • Other options for hospitals looking to improve inventory management beyond standard healthcare logistics companies
  • What can health systems do if their medical supply distributor consistently runs out of critical equipment?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 39 of 100 badge for Cardinal Health

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/cardinalhealth.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/cardinalhealth.com.svg" alt="Overall score 39 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo