Back to the study

Capitol Federal Savings Bank

capfed.com · Finance · CFFN

Ranked 1,698 of 2,047 companies in the study

26Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness14
What this means for Capitol Federal Savings Bank

AI assistants do not name Capitol Federal Savings Bank in any of the 60 answers. Its overall score is 26 out of 100, ranking 1,698th of 2,047, while the typical company in the finance sector scores 29. Its website passes 2 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the finance market: none named Capitol Federal Savings Bank. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical finance company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, Capitol Federal Savings Bank ranks 135 of 205 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
156 of 205
by overall score, where the typical finance company scores 29
How Capitol Federal Savings Bank compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
14

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with finance

205 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score26
Ranks 156 of 205. Typical company: 29
Named in answers0%
Ranks 135 of 205. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness14
Ranks 180 of 205. Typical company: 21
What Claude actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“What are the best banks in the Midwest for small business checking accounts?”

I'll search for information about the best banks in the Midwest for small business checking accounts.Let me search for more specific information about top Midwest banks for small business checking accounts.Based on my research, here are some of the best banks in the Midwest for small business checking accounts:

National Banks with Strong Midwest Presence

Wells Fargo is the highest-rated bank for small business in recent studies and is one of the most active SBA lenders in the U.S. Wells Fargo has three different business checking accounts intended for gradually larger enterprises: Initiat …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Named instead
UMB Bank1Commerce Bank1
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Commerce Bank
66.7%
UMB Bank
33.3%
Capitol Federal Savings Bank
0.0%
Central Bank
0.0%
INTRUST Bank
0.0%
Equity Bank
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals

The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPNot met

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 24 of 100 · 100% of checks could run · checked on October 4, 2026 · www.capfed.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

regions.com
38
forbes.com
30
bankrate.com
30
cnbc.com
18
nerdwallet.com
15
finance.yahoo.com
12
midwest.bank
10
money.com
9
airwallex.com
9
sofi.com
8

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What are the best banks in the Midwest for small business checking accounts?
  • What should I do if I can’t access my online banking portal at my regional bank?
  • What are some alternatives to traditional regional banks for business banking?
  • Why did my online bank transfer get delayed at a community bank?
  • Online banks vs local banks—what are the best alternatives for everyday banking?
  • Which type of bank is best for managing both personal and business finances?
  • What banking services are most helpful for small business owners?
  • Where can I find affordable home mortgage loan options at regional banks?
  • What are typical monthly fees for personal checking accounts at regional banks?
  • Credit unions vs regional banks for first-time homebuyers—what are the main differences?
  • How do personal savings accounts at community banks compare to those at national banks?
  • Are business checking accounts at local banks worth it for startups?
  • Is opening a high-yield savings account at a regional bank a good choice for emergency funds?
  • How do closing costs for home loans at community banks compare to those at big banks?
  • Which Midwest banks offer secure wealth management solutions for individuals?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo