Back to the study

Brink's

brinks.com · Industrial · BCO

Ranked 307 of 2,047 companies in the study

41Overall score
  • Visibility32
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment88
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Brink's

AI assistants name Brink's in 23.3% of answers, which is much more often than the typical company in its sector at 5%. Its overall score is 41 out of 100, ranking 307th of 2,047 companies. Brink's website passes 3 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named Brink's. AI assistants named it in 14 of 60 answers (23.3%). The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Brink's ranks 21 of 246 in its sector.

Named by AI in
23.3%
14 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
43.8%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
22 of 246
by overall score, where the typical industrial company scores 31
How Brink's compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
32

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
88

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with industrial

246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score41
Ranks 22 of 246. Typical company: 31
Named in answers23%
Ranks 21 of 246. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness21
Ranks 107 of 246. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“What are some non-bank options for secure cash processing?”

For businesses seeking secure cash processing without relying solely on traditional banks, several non-bank options and strategies can help streamline operations and enhance security:

Cash Management Services & Armored Car Services:

Brink's and SecureCash are examples of companies that provide secure cash management solutions. They offer services like secure cash handling and transport, scheduled pickup, and cash processing and reconciliation. These services can help reduce risk, save time, and automate manual tasks associated with cash handling.

SecureCash also …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Loomis13
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Brink's
51.9%
Loomis
40.7%
GardaWorld Cash Services
7.4%
Dunbar Armored (now part of Dunbar Security Solutions)
0.0%
Prosegur Cash
0.0%
CMS (Cash Management Solutions, Inc.)
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
5/15
Claude
4/15
Perplexity
3/15
OpenAI
2/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · us.brinks.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

us.brinks.com
40
loomis.us
32
fiserv.com
22
integratedcashlogistics.com
15
americansecuritysafes.com
14
sesami.io
9
nationallinkatm.com
8
brinks-ams.com
8
news.cdlatm.com
7
atmmarketplace.com
7

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (5 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • How to resolve issues with delayed cash pickups for business accounts
  • What are some non-bank options for secure cash processing?
  • What are the most secure cash management solutions for retail businesses in the US?
  • What can cause discrepancies between smart safe data and actual cash counts?
  • Where can enterprises find end-to-end cash management and logistics solutions?
  • What solutions help retailers reduce risk during cash deposits?
  • Best ATM managed services for multi-location enterprises
  • What factors influence ATM management service pricing in the US?
  • How can quick-service restaurants streamline daily cash processing?
  • How much do cash management services typically cost per month for a medium-sized business?
  • Is investing in outsourced cash logistics a good choice for restaurants?
  • Alternatives to armored transport for business cash deposits
  • ATM management versus traditional cash vault solutions: pros and cons
  • How does cash-in-transit security compare to on-site cash deposit services?
  • Are smart safes worth it for small business cash handling?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Share this result
Overall score 41 of 100 badge for Brink's

A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.

<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/brinks.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/brinks.com.svg" alt="Overall score 41 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>
Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo