Back to the study

Blinds to Go

blindstogo.com · Retail

Ranked 1,690 of 2,047 companies in the study

26Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations2
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness36
What this means for Blinds to Go

AI assistants do not name Blinds to Go in any of their 60 answers. Its overall score is 26 out of 100, ranking 1,690th of 2,047 companies and 522nd of 640 retail companies. The website passes 4 of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the retail market: none named Blinds to Go. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical retail company is named in 6.7% of answers. By how often it is named, Blinds to Go ranks 503 of 640 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
522 of 640
by overall score, where the typical retail company scores 34
How Blinds to Go compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
2

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
36

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with retail

640 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score26
Ranks 522 of 640. Typical company: 34
Named in answers0%
Ranks 503 of 640. Typical company: 7%
AI readiness36
Ranks 156 of 640. Typical company: 29
What Gemini actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“How do you fix cordless blinds that won’t lift properly?”

If your cordless blinds aren't lifting properly, it's often due to a problem with the internal spring mechanism or tension. Here's how you can troubleshoot and fix them:

1. Resetting the Tension:

For blinds that won't retract fully: Pull the shade down as far as it will go. If it's already down, give it a firm, steady tug to ensure it's fully extended. Then, while holding the bottom rail, slowly guide it up, maintaining resistance. This can help re-engage the spring with the spool. For some models, angling the bottom rail slightly (about 45 degrees) toward you while pushing up …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Named instead
The Shade Store1
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

The Shade Store
90.9%
Budget Blinds
9.1%
Blinds to Go
0.0%
3 Day Blinds
0.0%
Blindster
0.0%
SelectBlinds
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Can an AI agent buy here?

Not by itself. Blinds to Go publishes none of the purchase protocols we look for. An agent would have to click through the checkout like a person.

  • UCPNot present
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
63 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 32 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.blindstogo.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • PassedExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets rules for 1 AI crawler by name. All others follow its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBot*allowed
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

blindsgalore.com
20
blinds.com
11
homedepot.com
10
hunterdouglas.com
10
3dayblinds.com
9
theshadestore.com
9
aaablindandshutterfactory.com
8
blindstogo.com (its own website)
8
justdial.com
8
englishblinds.co.uk
6

In the study as US retailers: listed as a retailer in Wikidata, a public database, and among the websites Cloudflare Radar ranks as visited.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • How do you fix cordless blinds that won’t lift properly?
  • Why do blackout shades sometimes let in light around the edges?
  • Is there a significant price difference between custom-made and ready-made shades?
  • How do drapery panels compare to blinds for light control?
  • What are the best custom blinds for large living room windows?
  • Which type of window shades offers the most privacy for bedrooms?
  • What’s the best window covering option for homes with pets or small children?
  • What's the difference between roller shades and cellular shades for insulation?
  • Are custom window coverings worth the investment for a new home?
  • Are there eco-friendly alternatives to traditional vinyl window coverings?
  • What types of custom blinds are easiest to keep clean in the kitchen?
  • What determines the cost of custom window blinds in the US?
  • What are the best alternatives to cordless blinds for safety and convenience?
  • Is it better to get professional installation for custom window shades, or DIY?
  • What window shade options provide UV protection for sunny rooms?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo