Back to the study

Bally's

ballys.com · Travel · BALY

Ranked 1,792 of 2,047 companies in the study

25Overall score
  • Visibility2
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality67
  • AI readiness29
What this means for Bally's

AI assistants rarely name Bally's in their answers, mentioning it just once out of 60 answers reviewed. Bally's has an overall score of 25 out of 100, ranking 1,792nd of 2,047 companies. Its website passes 2 out of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the travel market: none named Bally's. AI assistants named it in 1 of 60 answers (1.7%). The typical travel company is named in 21.7% of answers. By how often it is named, Bally's ranks 59 of 75 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
1.7%
1 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
3.6%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
2/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
71 of 75
by overall score, where the typical travel company scores 37
How Bally's compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
2

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
67

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with travel

75 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score25
Ranks 71 of 75. Typical company: 37
Named in answers2%
Ranks 59 of 75. Typical company: 22%
AI readiness29
Ranks 16 of 75. Typical company: 21
What Perplexity actually said

An answer that names the company

“What type of casino resort is suitable for group celebrations like birthdays or reunions?”

A casino resort with flexible group event space, suites, and entertainment options is best for celebrations like birthdays or reunions. Resorts that explicitly market private parties, social events, and group getaways are especially suitable because they can handle both lodging and celebration planning in one place.

Good examples in the results include:

Resorts with birthday and party venues such as Jamul Casino Resort and Morongo Casino Resort & Spa.

Properties with large suites and shared amenities for group stays, such as Palms, Bally’s Lake …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Caesars Entertainment
52.2%
Hard Rock Hotel & Casino
39.1%
Bally's
4.3%
MGM Resorts International
4.3%
Boyd Gaming
0.0%
Penn Entertainment (formerly Penn National Gaming)
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Perplexity
1/15
Gemini
0/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.

To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers

The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
41 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPNot met

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 16 of 100 · 100% of checks could run · checked on October 4, 2026 · ballys.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

2 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

kayak.com
18
casinos.com
15
davestravelcorner.com
10
reddit.com
9
tripadvisor.com
9
legalsportsreport.com
8
quora.com
7
lasvegasjaunt.com
7
caesars.com
7
expedia.com
7

In the study as US-listed.

Every question, and where the company came up (1 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • How do all-inclusive casino resorts compare with standalone casinos in terms of value?
  • Is it worth booking a suite at a casino resort for a special occasion?
  • Are resort fees at casinos worth the extra amenities they provide?
  • Which casinos are best for couples seeking both gaming and spa experiences?
  • Which casinos offer unique gaming experiences along with live entertainment?
  • What can you do if your casino resort reservation is cancelled at the last minute?
  • What is the average price difference between standard and luxury rooms at casino resorts?
  • What are some alternatives to traditional casino resorts for nightlife and entertainment?
  • Best US casino destinations that offer both gaming and family-friendly amenities?
  • Casino hotel vs non-hotel casino: which is better for a full resort experience?
  • How much does a weekend stay at a US casino resort typically cost?
  • Are there options for online gaming that provide a similar experience to visiting a casino?
  • What are the best casinos and resorts in the US for a weekend getaway?
  • How to resolve issues with resort fees on your casino hotel bill?
  • What type of casino resort is suitable for group celebrations like birthdays or reunions?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo