Back to the study

Ball

ball.com · Industrial · BALL, BLL

Ranked 1,252 of 2,047 companies in the study

30Overall score
  • Visibility8
  • Citations1
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality87
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Ball

AI assistants rarely name Ball, mentioning it in 1 of 60 answers. This happens less often than for the typical company in the industrial sector. Ball has an overall score of 30 out of 100, which ranks 1,252nd of 2,047 companies. Its website passes 3 out of 14 technical checks for readiness for AI tools.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named Ball. AI assistants named it in 1 of 60 answers (1.7%). The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Ball ranks 159 of 246 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
1.7%
1 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
16.7%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
135 of 246
by overall score, where the typical industrial company scores 31
How Ball compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
8

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
1

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
87

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with industrial

246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score30
Ranks 135 of 246. Typical company: 31
Named in answers2%
Ranks 159 of 246. Typical company: 5%
AI readiness21
Ranks 107 of 246. Typical company: 21
What OpenAI actually said

An answer that names the company

“Best eco-friendly aluminum packaging solutions for personal care products”

Good question — aluminum is an excellent choice for personal‑care packaging because it’s lightweight, durable, corrosion‑resistant, and can be recycled indefinitely when collected. Below I summarize the best eco‑friendly aluminum packaging solutions for personal care (formats, benefits, tradeoffs) and practical guidance for choosing suppliers and making them truly low‑impact.

Top aluminum packaging formats (with why they’re good)

Refillable/reusable aluminum bottles (airless or threaded): durable, premium feel, designed for refill programs or refill cartridges. Great for lotions, serums, sh …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Ball
100.0%
Crown Holdings
0.0%
Ardagh Metal Packaging
0.0%
CANPACK
0.0%
Silgan Containers
0.0%
Envases
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

OpenAI
1/15
Gemini
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Claude
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals

The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.

Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.ball.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotpartly
  • ClaudeBotpartly
  • Anthropic-AIpartly
  • Google-Extendedpartly
  • Applebot-Extendedpartly
  • Meta-ExternalAgentpartly
  • FacebookBotpartly
  • Bytespiderpartly
  • CCBotpartly
  • Diffbotpartly
  • Omgilibotpartly
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotpartly
  • Claude-SearchBotpartly
  • PerplexityBotpartly
  • Applebotpartly
  • Amazonbotpartly
  • YouBotpartly
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userpartly
  • Claude-Userpartly
  • Perplexity-Userpartly
  • DuckAssistBotpartly
  • MistralAI-Userpartly

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

aluminum.org
27
alibaba.com
16
bevindustry.com
13
packagedsustainable.com
11
apackaginggroup.com
9
seller.alibaba.com
9
belvac.com
8
cancentral.com
7
justdial.com
7
trellis.net
6

In the study as S&P 500.

Every question, and where the company came up (1 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • Aluminum cans vs aluminum bottles for drink packaging — which is more recyclable?
  • How does the cost of sustainable aluminum packaging compare to traditional plastic packaging in the US?
  • Are premium aluminum packaging options a good investment for emerging brands?
  • What are the alternatives to aluminum aerosol containers for household products?
  • What are the most sustainable packaging options for beverage companies in the US?
  • Best eco-friendly aluminum packaging solutions for personal care products
  • What can cause labeling issues on aluminum bottles for personal care products?
  • Why do some aluminum containers develop dents during shipping?
  • Typical pricing tiers for custom-printed aluminum containers for small businesses
  • How does aluminum packaging compare to glass for household product sustainability?
  • Sustainable packaging alternatives to single-use plastic bottles for beverages
  • Is it worth switching to recycled aluminum containers for consumer goods packaging?
  • How can aluminum packaging support a circular economy for cleaning products?
  • Are there non-metal options that offer similar recyclability to aluminum packaging for personal care products?
  • Are aluminum cans suitable for carbonated drink packaging?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo