- Visibility32
- Citations3
- Sentiment50
- Site quality67
- AI readiness29
AI assistants name Axiom Space in 31.7% of answers, which is much more often than the typical company in its sector at 5%. Its overall score is 35 out of 100, ranking 803rd of 2,047 companies measured. The Axiom Space website passes 4 of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.
We asked 15 unbranded questions about the industrial market: none named Axiom Space. AI assistants named it in 19 of 60 answers (31.7%). The typical industrial company is named in 5.0% of answers. By how often it is named, Axiom Space ranks 11 of 246 in its sector.
Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.
This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named
Five parts, each scored out of 100.
How often AI assistants name the company
How often AI uses the company's own website as a source
How positively AI describes the company
How well built the website's own pages are
How easily AI tools can read and use the website
Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.
246 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.
An answer that names the company
“Is investing in commercial space station modules worth it for government research programs?”
Investing in commercial space station modules is generally considered a worthwhile endeavor for government research programs, especially as the International Space Station (ISS) approaches its planned retirement around 2030. This transition is driven by several compelling factors:
1. Continuity of Access to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and Microgravity Research:
The ISS has been crucial for microgravity research, offering insights and technologies beneficial to Earth.
Commercial stations will ensure continued access to this unique environment for scientific experiments and research tha …
The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.
How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals
Answers naming it, out of answers received
What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Level 0: Not yet agent-ready. Agents struggle to find basic information about the site.
- 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Show every check, for your technical teamHide the checks
- study: 92.0%robots.txtNot met
Publish a valid robots.txt with crawl rules and a Sitemap line.
- study: 86.8%SitemapPassed
An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.
- study: 0.3%Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
- study: 5.5%DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present
Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.
- study: 1.9%Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
- study: 25.1%llms.txtNot met
Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.
- study: 93.4%AI bot rulesPartly met
Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.
- study: 1.4%Content SignalsNot met
Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.
- study: 0.2%Web Bot AuthNot present
Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.
- study: 0.3%API CatalogNot met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
- study: 11.8%OAuth discoveryNot met
Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.
- study: 10.3%OAuth Protected ResourceNot met
Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.
- study: 0.0%auth.mdNot met
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
- study: 0.2%MCP Server CardNot met
Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.
- study: 0.1%A2A Agent CardNot met
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
- study: 0.2%Agent SkillsNot met
Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.
- study: 33.7%WebMCPCould not check
Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.
- study: 0.1%ARD manifestNot met
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
Score 15 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · axiomspace.com · 2,047 companies scanned
4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.
These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.
Show the 14 checksHide them
- Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
- PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
- PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
- Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
- Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
- PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
- Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
- Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
- Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
- Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
- Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
- Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers
In the study as Large private companies.
- How do clients resolve unexpected delays in the timeline for human spaceflight missions?
- What are common challenges in coordinating payload integration on commercial crewed missions?
- What new advancements are shaping the future of commercial space infrastructure in the US?
- Is investing in commercial space station modules worth it for government research programs?
- How can educational institutions leverage private astronaut missions for STEM programs?
- What use-cases exist for commercial low Earth orbit habitats in biotechnology research?
- How can private astronauts participate in low Earth orbit missions?
- What are the best human spaceflight services for commercial researchers looking to access low Earth orbit?
- Space infrastructure for research vs. infrastructure for tourism — what are the main differences?
- What alternatives are there for human-rated space habitat development besides orbital modules?
- Are turnkey crewed missions to low Earth orbit cost-effective for non-government organizations?
- What pricing structures are typical for multi-week crewed missions in low Earth orbit?
- How do end-to-end human spaceflight missions differ from modular space station development services?
- How do costs compare for single-seat bookings versus whole-mission charter in crewed orbital flights?
- Alternatives to crewed spaceflight services for microgravity research needs?
Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.
A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.
<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/axiomspace.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/axiomspace.com.svg" alt="Overall score 35 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>