Back to the study

Assurant

assurant.com · Finance · AIZ

Ranked 1,319 of 2,047 companies in the study

29Overall score
  • Visibility8
  • Citations1
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness29
What this means for Assurant

AI assistants rarely name Assurant, mentioning it in only 2 out of 60 answers. The assistants name others such as Asurion and AKKO in the same responses. Assurant has an overall score of 29 out of 100, matching the typical company in the finance sector, and ranks 1,319th of 2,047. Its website passes 4 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the finance market: none named Assurant. AI assistants named it in 2 of 60 answers (3.3%). The typical finance company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, Assurant ranks 87 of 205 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
3.3%
2 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
14.3%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
4/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
89 of 205
by overall score, where the typical finance company scores 29
How Assurant compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
8

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
1

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
29

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with finance

205 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score29
Ranks 89 of 205. Typical company: 29
Named in answers3%
Ranks 87 of 205. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness29
Ranks 30 of 205. Typical company: 21
What Gemini actually said

An answer that names the company

“Business-friendly alternatives to device insurance for retail brands?”

Retail brands looking for business-friendly alternatives to traditional device insurance have several options that can enhance customer loyalty, create recurring revenue, and differentiate their offerings. These alternatives often focus on service contracts, subscription models, and product lifecycle management.

Here are some business-friendly alternatives to device insurance for retail brands:

Extended Warranties and Service Contracts: Instead of traditional insurance, retailers can offer their own extended warranties or service contracts. These plans cover defects in materials and …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Asurion2AKKO1
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Asurion
33.3%
SquareTrade (an Allstate company)
33.3%
Assurant
22.2%
AKKO
11.1%
Allianz Partners USA
0.0%
CPS Central (Consumer Priority Service)
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Gemini
1/15
Perplexity
1/15
Claude
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 25 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.assurant.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

4 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

verizon.com
24
justdial.com
17
consumeraffairs.com
11
asurion.com
11
business.att.com
9
cpscentral.com
9
assurant.com (its own website)
7
insurify.com
7
bbb.org
6
alibaba.com
6

In the study as S&P 500.

Every question, and where the company came up (2 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • How to address customer complaints related to auto protection plan claims?
  • Ways connected device protection can reduce churn for mobile service providers
  • Is it cost-effective for retailers to bundle device protection with new tech sales?
  • How much do businesses typically pay to offer protection plans for smartphones?
  • Alternatives to traditional auto protection plans for ride share fleets
  • Differences between home protection plans and homeowners insurance for consumer electronics
  • Common issues faced by businesses when implementing home protection support services
  • Examples of how support programs improve the experience for smart home device users
  • Business-friendly alternatives to device insurance for retail brands?
  • How can brands provide support solutions for smart home products?
  • Device insurance vs extended warranties for electronics – which offers more value for business clients?
  • What are some options besides extended warranties for consumer electronics protection?
  • Are auto protection services worth the investment for companies managing vehicle fleets?
  • What are the best ways for businesses to offer protection plans for connected devices?
  • What factors influence the cost of home protection solutions for brands?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo