Back to the study

Anheuser-Busch

anheuser-busch.com · Consumer goods

Ranked 1,170 of 2,047 companies in the study

31Overall score
  • Visibility7
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality80
  • AI readiness50
What this means for Anheuser-Busch

AI assistants rarely name Anheuser-Busch, appearing in 1 out of 60 answers, alongside companies like Yuengling. Its overall score is 31 out of 100, ranking 1,170th of 2,047 companies. The website passes 5 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the consumer goods market: none named Anheuser-Busch. AI assistants named it in 1 of 60 answers (1.7%). The typical consumer goods company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, Anheuser-Busch ranks 63 of 118 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
1.7%
1 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
14.3%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
5/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
50 of 118
by overall score, where the typical consumer goods company scores 30
How Anheuser-Busch compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
7

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
80

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
50

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with consumer goods

118 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score31
Ranks 50 of 118. Typical company: 30
Named in answers2%
Ranks 63 of 118. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness50
Ranks 7 of 118. Typical company: 21
What OpenAI actually said

An answer that names the company

“Best light beers made in the USA for low-calorie options?”

Here are widely available low‑calorie light beers brewed/distributed in the U.S., with calories (per 12 fl oz), carbs and ABV — and a quick recommendation for when to pick each.

Top low‑calorie U.S. light beers

Budweiser Select 55 — 55 kcal, ~1.9–2.4 g carbs, ~2.4% ABV. Lowest‑calorie mainstream option if calories are the only priority. (anheuser-busch.com)

Michelob ULTRA — 95 kcal, 2.6 g carbs, ~4.2% ABV. Very common “ultra” choice: low calories and low carbs while …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Also named
Yuengling1
Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Anheuser-Busch
50.0%
Yuengling
50.0%
Molson Coors Beverage Company
0.0%
Constellation Brands (beer division)
0.0%
Heineken USA
0.0%
Pabst Brewing Company
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

OpenAI
1/15
Gemini
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Claude
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
50 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtPassed

    An llms.txt that tells language models what the site offers.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 36 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.anheuser-busch.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

5 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • PassedHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Passedllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

tastingtable.com
17
reddit.com
14
vinepair.com
12
en.wikipedia.org
10
beerandbrewing.com
10
byo.com
10
hopculture.com
9
bjcp.org
9
foodandwine.com
7
alibaba.com
7

In the study as Consumer brands.

Every question, and where the company came up (1 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • What are some non-beer alternatives for people who like malty flavors?
  • How does the cost of domestic American beer compare to imports?
  • Why does beer sometimes taste stale after opening a can?
  • What are the most popular types of American beers for summer barbecues?
  • Best beer styles to pair with spicy barbecue foods?
  • What is the average price range for a six-pack of American lager?
  • How do American wheat beers compare to American pale ales?
  • How can you keep bottled beers fresh for longer at home?
  • What beverages are similar to beer but contain less alcohol for social events?
  • Lager vs. ale — which is better for casual drinking?
  • Are premium domestic beers better than budget options in the US?
  • What American beer styles are good for watching sports?
  • Is craft beer from local breweries worth the higher price?
  • Best light beers made in the USA for low-calorie options?
  • Alternatives to traditional American lagers for people who prefer lighter drinks?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo