Back to the study

Amgen

amgen.com · Healthcare · AMGN

Ranked 1,868 of 2,047 companies in the study

24Overall score
  • Visibility0
  • Citations0
  • Sentiment50
  • Site quality73
  • AI readiness21
What this means for Amgen

AI assistants do not name Amgen in any of their 60 answers to questions about the healthcare market. Its overall score is 24 out of 100, ranking 1,868th of 2,047 companies, which is below the typical company in this sector. The website passes 3 of 14 technical checks for AI tool readiness.

We asked 15 unbranded questions about the healthcare market: none named Amgen. AI assistants named it in none of 60 answers. The typical healthcare company is named in 3.3% of answers. By how often it is named, Amgen ranks 69 of 105 in its sector.

Named fewer than three times in total. Read this as a sign that AI assistants rarely bring this company up, not as an exact comparison with its rivals.

Named by AI in
0.0%
0 of 60 answers
Share of mentions
0.0%
compared with 5 rivals
AI readiness
3/14
technical checks passed. Typical for its sector: 3
Rank in its sector
100 of 105
by overall score, where the typical healthcare company scores 31
How Amgen compares with all 2,047 companies

Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.

This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named

What makes up the score

Five parts, each scored out of 100.

Visibility
0

How often AI assistants name the company

Citations
0

How often AI uses the company's own website as a source

Sentiment
50

How positively AI describes the company

Site quality
73

How well built the website's own pages are

AI readiness
21

How easily AI tools can read and use the website

Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.

Compared with healthcare

105 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.

Overall score24
Ranks 100 of 105. Typical company: 31
Named in answers0%
Ranks 69 of 105. Typical company: 3%
AI readiness21
Ranks 53 of 105. Typical company: 21
What Claude actually said

The company is not named in this answer

“Best biotech medicines for managing chronic autoimmune conditions”

I'll search for current information on the best biotech medicines for managing chronic autoimmune conditions.Let me search for more specific information about established biotech medicines currently used for autoimmune conditions.Based on current biotech advances, here are the best biotech medicines for managing chronic autoimmune conditions:

Established Biologic Drug Classes

The major classes include TNF inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors, IL-1 inhibitors, B-cell depleting agents, T-cell co-stimulation blockers, and JAK inhibitors.

TNF Inhibitors: Anti-TNF antibodies infliximab, adalimumab …

The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.

Share of mentions

How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
100.0%
Amgen
0.0%
Genentech
0.0%
Gilead Sciences
0.0%
Biogen
0.0%
Bristol Myers Squibb
0.0%
Which AI assistants named the company

Answers naming it, out of answers received

Claude
0/15
Gemini
0/15
OpenAI
0/15
Perplexity
0/15
Ready for AI agents

What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5

Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.

To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Show every check, for your technical team
Discoverability
77 of 100
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    study: 92.0%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    study: 86.8%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    study: 0.3%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    study: 5.5%
Content accessibility
0 of 100
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    study: 1.9%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    study: 25.1%
Bot access control
32 of 100
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    study: 93.4%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    study: 1.4%
  • Web Bot AuthCould not check

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    study: 0.2%
APIs, auth and MCP
0 of 100
  • API CatalogCould not check

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    study: 0.3%
  • OAuth discoveryCould not check

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    study: 11.8%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceCould not check

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    study: 10.3%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    study: 0.0%
  • MCP Server CardCould not check

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    study: 0.2%
  • A2A Agent CardCould not check

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    study: 0.1%
  • Agent SkillsCould not check

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    study: 0.2%
  • WebMCPCould not check

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    study: 33.7%
  • ARD manifestCould not check

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    study: 0.1%

Score 37 of 100 · 65% of checks could run · checked on October 5, 2026 · www.amgen.com · 2,047 companies scanned

See how every company did, and how this was measured.

The checks behind the AI readiness score

3 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.

These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.

Show the 14 checks
Discoverability
  • Passedrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
  • PassedXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
  • Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
Content Accessibility
  • Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
  • Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
  • PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
Bot Access Control
  • Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
API / Auth / MCP
  • Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
  • Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
  • Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
  • Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
  • Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
  • Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
What AI crawlers may read (robots.txt)

This website sets no rules for any AI crawler by name, like 84% of the websites whose rules we could read. Every AI crawler follows its general rules.

Training AI
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
AI search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
Answering questions
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed

Read from the website’s own rules file (robots.txt). An asterisk marks a crawler the file names. The rest follow its general rules. “Partly” means only some pages are blocked.

Websites the AI used as sources

How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
100
fda.gov
35
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
15
nature.com
9
labiotech.eu
9
frontiersin.org
8
pfizer.com
6
marketbeat.com
6
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
6
tandfonline.com
5

In the study as S&P 500.

Every question, and where the company came up (0 of 15)
QuestionOpenAIClaudePerplexityGemini
  • How do biologics compare to traditional pharmaceuticals when treating cancer?
  • How can healthcare professionals identify efficacy issues with new biotechnology therapies?
  • Best biotech medicines for managing chronic autoimmune conditions
  • Typical pricing for cutting-edge biotechnology pharmaceuticals in the United States
  • Alternatives to biologics for patients with an intolerance to injectable medicines
  • What should patients do if they experience side effects from advanced biotech medicines?
  • Ways medical researchers leverage biotechnology to advance personalized medicine
  • How are novel biotech medicines used in pediatric cancer treatment?
  • What are the leading biotechnology breakthroughs for treating serious diseases?
  • Factors that influence the cost of advanced biologic treatments
  • Biotechnology therapies vs. small molecule drugs: which offers better outcomes for rare diseases?
  • Are innovative biotechnology therapies worth the higher cost for patients with limited treatment options?
  • Non-biotechnology treatment options for those unable to access advanced therapies
  • Most promising clinical trial areas in U.S. biotechnology for rare disease patients
  • Is it beneficial to switch to a biosimilar for ongoing treatment of a serious illness?
named the companyanswered without naming itdid not answer

Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.

Next step

Want AI assistants to name your company?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo