- Visibility32
- Citations2
- Sentiment50
- Site quality80
- AI readiness7
AI assistants name 10X Genomics in 30% of answers, which is more often than the typical company in the technology sector at 10%. The company has an overall score of 35 out of 100, ranking 804th of 2,047 companies. Its website passes 1 of 14 technical checks for readiness with AI tools.
We asked 15 unbranded questions about the technology market: none named 10X Genomics. AI assistants named it in 18 of 60 answers (30.0%). The typical technology company is named in 10.0% of answers. By how often it is named, 10X Genomics ranks 47 of 273 in its sector.
Every dot is a company in the study. Hover one to see it; click to open its report.
This companySame sectorEvery other companyNever named
Five parts, each scored out of 100.
How often AI assistants name the company
How often AI uses the company's own website as a source
How positively AI describes the company
How well built the website's own pages are
How easily AI tools can read and use the website
Visibility is calculated from the answers on this page. How the score is built.
273 companies in this sector. The line on each bar is the typical company.
An answer that names the company
“What technologies are available for whole-transcriptome profiling at single-cell resolution?”
I'll search for current information on single-cell transcriptome profiling technologies.Let me search for more specific information about different single-cell transcriptomics technologies.Let me search for information on long-read single-cell sequencing technologies like PacBio and Oxford Nanopore.Based on my search results, I can provide you with a comprehensive overview of technologies available for whole-transcriptome profiling at single-cell resolution:
Major Technology Platforms
Short-Read Sequencing Technologies
There are three prevalent droplet-based systems for high-throughp …
The AI’s answer as we received it, shortened and not checked for accuracy.
How the mentions in these answers were split between this company and its rivals
Answers naming it, out of answers received
What this website publishes for an AI agent to read, use and buy from, on a scale of six levels.
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Level 1: Basic web presence. Two of robots.txt, a sitemap and Link headers are in place.
- Content Signals
The website turns away requests that do not come from a browser. AI agents that say what they are meet the same refusal.
Show every check, for your technical teamHide the checks
- study: 92.0%robots.txtPassed
A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.
- study: 86.8%SitemapPassed
An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.
- study: 0.3%Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
- study: 5.5%DNS for AI DiscoveryPassed
SVCB or HTTPS records under _agents that advertise agent endpoints.
- study: 1.9%Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
- study: 25.1%llms.txtNot met
Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.
- study: 93.4%AI bot rulesPartly met
Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.
- study: 1.4%Content SignalsNot met
Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.
- study: 0.2%Web Bot AuthNot present
Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.
- study: 0.3%API CatalogNot met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
- study: 11.8%OAuth discoveryNot met
Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.
- study: 10.3%OAuth Protected ResourceNot met
Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.
- study: 0.0%auth.mdNot met
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
- study: 0.2%MCP Server CardNot met
Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.
- study: 0.1%A2A Agent CardNot met
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
- study: 0.2%Agent SkillsNot met
Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.
- study: 33.7%WebMCPCould not check
Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.
- study: 0.1%ARD manifestNot met
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
Score 28 of 100 · 97% of checks could run · checked on October 3, 2026 · 10xgenomics.com · 2,047 companies scanned
1 of 14 passed. This list is for your technical team. The percentage is how many companies in the study pass each check.
These 14 checks ran during the audit and are what the AI readiness part of the overall score counts. The scan above ran later and is stricter on Link headers and Markdown, so a check can pass here and not there.
Show the 14 checksHide them
- Not metrobots.txt publishedstudy: 85.0%
- Not metXML sitemapstudy: 73.2%
- Not metHTTP Link headers (RFC 8288)study: 29.0%
- Not metMarkdown content negotiationstudy: 8.3%
- Not metllms.txt publishedstudy: 21.7%
- PassedToken budget (page weight)study: 95.2%
- Not metExplicit AI bot rulesstudy: 13.0%
- Not metAPI Catalog (.well-known/api-catalog)study: 0.2%
- Not metOAuth Authorization Server discoverystudy: 10.1%
- Not metOAuth Protected Resource discoverystudy: 9.3%
- Not metMCP Server Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metA2A Agent Cardstudy: 0.0%
- Not metWebMCP toolsstudy: 4.2%
- Not metAgent Skills declaredstudy: 0.0%
How many times each website was listed as a source in these answers
In the study as US-listed.
- Spatial genomics vs single-cell genomics: Which approach is better for cancer research?
- How can spatial genomics help uncover mechanisms behind treatment success or failure in oncology?
- Is investing in advanced genomics instrumentation worth it for a mid-sized academic lab?
- How does single-cell RNA sequencing compare to bulk RNA sequencing for profiling tissues?
- What are typical genomics workflows used in pharmaceutical drug development?
- What technologies are available for whole-transcriptome profiling at single-cell resolution?
- Do premium genomics software solutions provide measurable benefits over basic analysis tools?
- Which lower-cost genomics analysis tools are available for laboratories with limited budgets?
- What is the price range for spatial genomics instruments and consumables in the US?
- Which single-cell analysis instruments are most popular in biomedical research labs?
- What are some alternatives to high-throughput spatial profiling platforms in genomics?
- Are there affordable options for single-cell transcriptomics solutions for academic research groups?
- What are common challenges when working with FFPE samples in high-throughput single-cell workflows?
- Why might a spatial transcriptomics experiment yield low sensitivity or poor sample coverage?
- What are the best genomics platforms for spatial transcriptomics research?
Columns, left to right: OpenAI, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. The AI assistants often disagree. Across the study, on 40% of the questions where a company is named, only one of the four names it.
A badge of this result that you can show on your own website. Copy the code below.
<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/10xgenomics.com"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/us/badges/10xgenomics.com.svg" alt="Overall score 35 of 100, US AI Visibility Study 2026" width="280" height="64"></a>