Back to overview

WEB.DE

web.deMedia and portals
agma DNA reach ranking #2
Level
0
Not yet agent-ready
Agent readiness score
22
AEO score
21
AI mention rate
52%

WEB.DE achieves an AEO score of 21, ranking 55th of 79 in the 'Medien und Portale' industry. AI engines name the brand in 51.7% of answers. The agent readiness score is 22 (level 0), with sitemap, link header, markdown negotiation, llms.txt, and content signals not yet in place.

The next three steps
  1. 1Sitemap

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    A step toward level 1

  2. 2Link headers

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    A step toward level 1

  3. 3Markdown negotiation

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

Compared with Media and portals
  • Agent readiness22
    Industry median 24 · rank 67 of 79
  • AEO score21
    Industry median 27 · rank 55 of 79
  • Mentions in AI answers52
    Industry median 27 · rank 5 of 79
  • Visibility17
    Industry median 20 · rank 42 of 79
  • Citations2
    Industry median 2 · rank 31 of 79
  • Sentiment53
    Industry median 68 · rank 57 of 79
Agent readiness level
  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
To reach level 1:
  • 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
Areas
  • Discoverability41
  • Content accessibility0
  • Bot access control63
  • APIs, auth and MCP0
Every check
Discoverability
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    Top sites: 98%
  • SitemapNot met

    Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.

    Top sites: 88%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    Top sites: 0%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    Top sites: 5%
Content accessibility
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    Top sites: 2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    Top sites: 15%
Bot access control
  • AI bot rulesPassed

    Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.

    Top sites: 99%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    Top sites: 2%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    Top sites: 0%
APIs, auth and MCP
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    Top sites: 0%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    Top sites: 1%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    Top sites: 1%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    Top sites: 0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    Top sites: 0%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    Top sites: 0%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    Top sites: 0%
  • WebMCPNot met

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    Top sites: 1%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    Top sites: 0%
AI crawler rules (robots.txt)
Training
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • GoogleOtherallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • AI2Botallowed
  • Cohere-AIallowed
  • Claude-Weballowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
Search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
  • Timpibotallowed
Assistant
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed
Agentic commerce
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • UCPNot present
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present

Protocols that let AI agents shop and pay by themselves. They don't count toward the level.

Agent readiness score 22 · coverage 100% · checked on 19/09/2026 · web.de

Mentions per AI engine
  • AIOpenAI9/15 · 60%
    Sentiment: 0% positive, 100% neutral, 0% critical
  • CClaude6/15 · 40%
    Sentiment: 29% positive, 57% neutral, 0% critical
  • PPerplexity6/15 · 40%
    Sentiment: 0% positive, 100% neutral, 0% critical
  • GGemini10/15 · 67%
    Sentiment: 9% positive, 82% neutral, 9% critical
Spotlight: Gemini
67%10 of 15 answers name WEB.DE
„Welcher kostenlose E-Mail-Dienst ist am besten für private Nutzer in Deutschland geeignet?“
Für private Nutzer in Deutschland hängt der "beste" kostenlose E-Mail-Dienst stark davon ab, worauf du den größten Wert legst: Datenschutz oder Funktionsumfang und Speicherplatz . Hier ist eine Übersicht der beliebtesten und bestgeeigneten Optionen: 1. Für Datenschutz & Sicherheit (Server in Deutschland / Europa)IONOSIONOSKostenlose E-Mail: 7 E-Mail-Anbieter im Vergleich - IONOS„ Microsoft 365 Business. Google …

AI answer as returned, unverified and shortened.

Gemini names instead
  • ARD
  • ZDF
  • Deutschlandfunk
  • Die Zeit
  • Der Spiegel
  • PressReader
  • Onleihe
  • E-Mail-Dienst
Sources: chip.de, ionos.de, experte.de, mailvergleich.de, domaindiscount24.com, mailbox.org
Share of voice
  • GMX10.2%
  • WEB.DE4.6%
  • mail.de2.5%
  • T-Online0.9%
  • Yahoo Mail Deutschland0%
  • Outlook.com (Microsoft Deutschland)0%
Most cited sources
  1. 1.n-tv.de22
  2. 2.chip.de17
  3. 3.pcwelt.de14
  4. 4.ionos.de14
  5. 5.tuta.com12
  6. 6.clean.email10
  7. 7.mailvergleich.de10
  8. 8.gmx.net10

Own domain's share of all citations: 1.5%

Every question and answer
Question (original German)AIOpenAICClaudePPerplexityGGemini
Was sind mögliche Alternativen zu kostenlosen Online-Portalen für aktuelle Nachrichten und Services?
Kostenloser E-Mail-Dienst vs. kostenpflichtiger Premium-Mail-Service – worin liegen die Unterschiede?
Welche aktuellen Online-Portale bieten sowohl Nachrichten als auch E-Mail-Funktionen an?
Lohnt sich der Umstieg auf einen kostenpflichtigen E-Mail-Tarif wegen zusätzlicher Funktionen?
Cloud-Speicher im E-Mail-Dienst: Welche Arten bieten Gratis-Angebote, welche nur gegen Aufpreis?
Wie nutzt man einen kostenlosen E-Mail-Dienst am besten, um mehrere Konten zu verwalten?
Welcher kostenlose E-Mail-Dienst ist am besten für private Nutzer in Deutschland geeignet?
Ist ein kostenfreier E-Mail-Account auch für berufliche Kommunikation ausreichend sicher?
Welche Alternativen gibt es zu den klassischen kostenlosen E-Mail-Postfächern für den digitalen Alltag?
Gibt es bei kostenlosen Online-Portalen die Möglichkeit, persönliche Dateien sicher online zu speichern?
Was kann ich tun, wenn mein Zugang zu einem kostenlosen E-Mail-Dienst gesperrt wurde?
Welche Zusatzfunktionen kosten bei E-Mail-Anbietern in Deutschland extra?
Warum kommen E-Mails in meinem kostenlosen Postfach manchmal nicht an?
Wie unterscheiden sich Preismodelle für Cloud-Speicher bei deutschen E-Mail-Diensten?
Gibt es interessante E-Mail-Dienste speziell für Nutzer, die besonderen Wert auf Datenschutz in Deutschland legen?
  • Brand named, positive
  • Brand named, neutral
  • Brand named, critical
  • Only competitors named
  • Brand not named
  • No answer

Audit completed on 19 September 2026. Methodology

Next step

How does your brand compare?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo