- Level
- 0
- Not yet agent-ready
- Agent readiness score
- 22
- AEO score
- 30
- AI mention rate
- 27%
It stands out that AI engines name the brand in 26.7% of answers; the AEO score is 30 (ranked 24th of 79 in the industry). The agent readiness score is at level 0 with 22 points, with sitemap, link header, markdown negotiation, llms.txt and content signals not yet in place.
- 1Sitemap
Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.
A step toward level 1
- 2Link headers
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
A step toward level 1
- 3Markdown negotiation
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
- Agent readiness22Industry median 24 · rank 67 of 79
- AEO score30Industry median 27 · rank 24 of 79
- Mentions in AI answers27Industry median 27 · rank 34 of 79
- Visibility21Industry median 20 · rank 36 of 79
- Citations4Industry median 2 · rank 14 of 79
- Sentiment82Industry median 68 · rank 13 of 79
- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 2 of robots.txt, Sitemap, Link headers
- Discoverability41
- Content accessibility0
- Bot access control63
- APIs, auth and MCP0
- Top sites: 98%robots.txtPassed
A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.
- Top sites: 88%SitemapNot met
Serve an XML sitemap and reference it from robots.txt.
- Top sites: 0%Link headersNot met
Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.
- Top sites: 5%DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present
Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.
- Top sites: 2%Markdown negotiationNot met
Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.
- Top sites: 15%llms.txtNot met
Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.
- Top sites: 99%AI bot rulesPassed
Explicit robots.txt rules for AI crawlers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot.
- Top sites: 2%Content SignalsNot met
Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.
- Top sites: 0%Web Bot AuthNot present
Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.
- Top sites: 0%API CatalogNot met
List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.
- Top sites: 1%OAuth discoveryNot met
Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.
- Top sites: 1%OAuth Protected ResourceNot met
Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.
- Top sites: 0%auth.mdNot met
Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.
- Top sites: 0%MCP Server CardNot met
Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.
- Top sites: 0%A2A Agent CardNot met
Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.
- Top sites: 0%Agent SkillsNot met
Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.
- Top sites: 1%WebMCPNot met
Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.
- Top sites: 0%ARD manifestNot met
Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.
- GPTBotallowed
- ClaudeBotallowed
- Anthropic-AIallowed
- Google-Extendedallowed
- GoogleOtherallowed
- Applebot-Extendedallowed
- Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
- FacebookBotallowed
- Bytespiderallowed
- CCBotallowed
- AI2Botallowed
- Cohere-AIallowed
- Claude-Weballowed
- Omgilibotallowed
- Diffbotallowed
- OAI-SearchBotallowed
- Claude-SearchBotallowed
- PerplexityBotallowed
- Applebotallowed
- Amazonbotallowed
- YouBotallowed
- Timpibotallowed
- ChatGPT-Userallowed
- Claude-Userallowed
- Perplexity-Userallowed
- DuckAssistBotallowed
- MistralAI-Userallowed
- x402Not present
- MPPNot present
- UCPNot present
- ACPNot present
- AP2Not present
Protocols that let AI agents shop and pay by themselves. They don't count toward the level.
Agent readiness score 22 · coverage 100% · checked on 21/09/2026 · kachelmannwetter.com
- AIOpenAI2/15 · 13%Sentiment: 100% positive, 0% neutral, 0% critical
- CClaude3/15 · 20%Sentiment: 67% positive, 33% neutral, 0% critical
- PPerplexity4/15 · 27%Sentiment: 33% positive, 67% neutral, 0% critical
- GGemini7/15 · 47%Sentiment: 58% positive, 42% neutral, 0% critical
Die Frage, ob sich ein kostenpflichtiges Wetter-Abonnement für genaue lokale Vorhersagen lohnt, hängt stark von den individuellen Bedürfnissen und Erwartungen ab. Es gibt sowohl kostenlose als auch kostenpflichtige Optionen, die unterschiedliche Vor- und Nachteile bieten. Vorteile von kostenpflichtigen Wetter-Abos: Werbefreiheit und Tracking-Schutz: Viele kostenpflichtige Abonnements, wie das PUR-Modell von …AI answer as returned, unverified and shortened.
- WetterOnline
- Deutscher Wetterdienst
- Meteostat
- Meteomatics
- MetGIS
- Meteoblue
- NOAA
- GFS-Modell
- WetterOnline5.9%
- Kachelmannwetter5.5%
- wetter.com3.1%
- Wetter.de0.4%
- DWD (Deutscher Wetterdienst)0.4%
- Unwetterzentrale (by MeteoGroup)0%
- 1.dwd.de26
- 2.kachelmannwetter.com24
- 3.wetteronline.de14
- 4.meteoblue.com14
- 5.content.meteoblue.com13
- 6.rainviewer.com12
- 7.meteomatics.com12
- 8.wetter.com12
Own domain's share of all citations: 4.2%
| Question (original German) | AIOpenAI | CClaude | PPerplexity | GGemini |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wie unterscheiden sich Wetterprognosen für Verbraucher gegenüber professionellen Business-Lösungen? | ||||
| Lohnt sich ein kostenpflichtiges Wetter-Abo für genaue lokale Vorhersagen? | ||||
| Welche kostenlosen Alternativen gibt es zu hochauflösenden Wetterradaren für Deutschland? | ||||
| Welche Wetterdaten eignen sich am besten für Landwirte in Deutschland? | ||||
| Was sind die besten Quellen für präzise Blitzanalysen auf Straßenebene in Deutschland? | ||||
| Wie kann ich Probleme mit der Darstellung von Niederschlagsradar auf meinem Gerät beheben? | ||||
| Warum wird meine lokale Wetteranzeige manchmal nicht korrekt geladen? | ||||
| Ist ein werbefreies Wetterportal wirklich besser für die tägliche Nutzung? | ||||
| Welche Wettervorhersageportale bieten die detailliertesten Regenradar-Daten für Deutschland? | ||||
| Wie unterscheiden sich die Preise für Premium-Wetterdienste mit HD-Radar und Analysefunktionen? | ||||
| Wie kann ich Wetterarchive für die Planung von Outdoor-Events nutzen? | ||||
| Gibt es günstige Abos für professionelle Wetterdaten in Deutschland? | ||||
| Was sind die Unterschiede zwischen Radar-HD-Daten und klassischen Wettervorhersagekarten? | ||||
| Welche Online-Plattformen bieten Blitzeinschlagsanalysen außer den bekannten Diensten? | ||||
| Wo finde ich historische Wetterdaten ohne teures Abo? |
- Brand named, positive
- Brand named, neutral
- Brand named, critical
- Only competitors named
- Brand not named
- No answer
Audit completed on 21 September 2026. Methodology