Back to overview

Fressnapf

fressnapf.deOnline retail
EHI top 100 online shops #45
Level
1
Basic web presence
Agent readiness score
24
AEO score
32
AI mention rate
35%

Fressnapf ranks 15th of 59 in online retail with an AEO score of 32, and AI engines name the brand in 35% of answers. The agent readiness score is level 1 (web basics) at 24, slightly below the industry median of 29. Link-header, markdown negotiation, llms.txt, content signals and an API catalogue are not yet in place.

The next three steps
  1. 1Content Signals

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    A step toward level 2

  2. 2Markdown negotiation

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

  3. 3llms.txt

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

Compared with Online retail
  • Agent readiness24
    Industry median 29 · rank 40 of 57
  • AEO score32
    Industry median 28 · rank 15 of 59
  • Mentions in AI answers35
    Industry median 13 · rank 10 of 59
  • Visibility29
    Industry median 20 · rank 20 of 59
  • Citations3
    Industry median 1 · rank 9 of 59
  • Sentiment75
    Industry median 74 · rank 22 of 59
Agent readiness level
  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
To reach level 2:
  • Content Signals
Areas
  • Discoverability77
  • Content accessibility0
  • Bot access control32
  • APIs, auth and MCP0
Every check
Discoverability
  • robots.txtPassed

    A valid robots.txt with crawl rules at the site root.

    Top sites: 98%
  • SitemapPassed

    An XML sitemap listing the pages, ideally referenced from robots.txt.

    Top sites: 88%
  • Link headersNot met

    Send Link headers such as rel="api-catalog" or rel="describedby" on the homepage.

    Top sites: 0%
  • DNS for AI DiscoveryNot present

    Advertise agent endpoints with SVCB records under _agents.

    Top sites: 5%
Content accessibility
  • Markdown negotiationNot met

    Return a markdown version when asked with Accept: text/markdown, for example at the CDN.

    Top sites: 2%
  • llms.txtNot met

    Publish an llms.txt with a short summary and the key links.

    Top sites: 15%
Bot access control
  • AI bot rulesPartly met

    Add explicit robots.txt groups for the main AI crawlers.

    Top sites: 99%
  • Content SignalsNot met

    Add a Content-Signal line for search, ai-input and ai-train to robots.txt.

    Top sites: 2%
  • Web Bot AuthNot present

    Only relevant if you run your own agents or crawlers: publish a signing key directory.

    Top sites: 0%
APIs, auth and MCP
  • API CatalogNot met

    List public APIs in a linkset at /.well-known/api-catalog.

    Top sites: 0%
  • OAuth discoveryNot met

    Publish OpenID Connect or OAuth server metadata under /.well-known.

    Top sites: 1%
  • OAuth Protected ResourceNot met

    Serve protected resource metadata at /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource.

    Top sites: 1%
  • auth.mdNot met

    Publish an auth.md describing how agents sign in.

    Top sites: 0%
  • MCP Server CardNot met

    Offer an MCP server and publish its server card under /.well-known.

    Top sites: 0%
  • A2A Agent CardNot met

    Publish an agent card at /.well-known/agent-card.json.

    Top sites: 0%
  • Agent SkillsNot met

    Publish a skills index with the main tasks agents can do.

    Top sites: 0%
  • WebMCPNot met

    Register key actions such as search or cart as WebMCP tools.

    Top sites: 1%
  • ARD manifestNot met

    Publish an ai-catalog.json listing every agent interface.

    Top sites: 0%
AI crawler rules (robots.txt)
Training
  • GPTBotallowed
  • ClaudeBotallowed
  • Anthropic-AIallowed
  • Google-Extendedallowed
  • GoogleOtherallowed
  • Applebot-Extendedallowed
  • Meta-ExternalAgentallowed
  • FacebookBotallowed
  • Bytespiderallowed
  • CCBotallowed
  • AI2Botallowed
  • Cohere-AIallowed
  • Claude-Weballowed
  • Omgilibotallowed
  • Diffbotallowed
Search
  • OAI-SearchBotallowed
  • Claude-SearchBotallowed
  • PerplexityBotallowed
  • Applebotallowed
  • Amazonbotallowed
  • YouBotallowed
  • Timpibotallowed
Assistant
  • ChatGPT-Userallowed
  • Claude-Userallowed
  • Perplexity-Userallowed
  • DuckAssistBotallowed
  • MistralAI-Userallowed
Agentic commerce
  • x402Not present
  • MPPNot present
  • UCPNot present
  • ACPNot present
  • AP2Not present

Protocols that let AI agents shop and pay by themselves. They don't count toward the level.

Agent readiness score 24 · coverage 100% · checked on 21/09/2026 · www.fressnapf.de

Mentions per AI engine
  • AIOpenAI7/15 · 47%
    Sentiment: 56% positive, 44% neutral, 0% critical
  • CClaude5/15 · 33%
    Sentiment: 50% positive, 50% neutral, 0% critical
  • PPerplexity5/15 · 33%
    Sentiment: 60% positive, 40% neutral, 0% critical
  • GGemini4/15 · 27%
    Sentiment: 50% positive, 50% neutral, 0% critical
Spotlight: Gemini
27%4 of 15 answers name Fressnapf
„Sind Online-Shops für Tierbedarf günstiger als stationäre Läden in Deutschland?“
Es gibt gute Gründe zu der Annahme, dass Online-Shops für Tierbedarf in Deutschland oft günstiger sind als stationäre Läden. Hier sind die Hauptgründe und weitere Überlegungen: 1. Geringere Betriebskosten im Online-Handel Online-Händler haben im Vergleich zu stationären Geschäften oft geringere Kosten für Miete, Personal und Infrastruktur. Diese Einsparungen können sie in Form von niedrigeren Preisen an die Kunden …

AI answer as returned, unverified and shortened.

Gemini names instead
  • Zooplus
  • Terra Canis
  • Verbraucherzentrale
  • PayPal
  • Amazon Pay
  • Klarna
  • LucyBalu
  • Profeline
Sources: zooplus.de, fressnapf.de, zooroyal.de, tiershop.de, bitiba.de, futterplatz.de
Share of voice
  • Fressnapf9.3%
  • zooplus5.1%
  • ZooRoyal5.1%
  • Das Futterhaus0.9%
  • Pets Deli0.5%
  • Kölle Zoo0.5%
Most cited sources
  1. 1.zooplus.de30
  2. 2.rtl.de29
  3. 3.fressnapf.de18
  4. 4.zooroyal.de11
  5. 5.verbraucherzentrale.de10
  6. 6.bitiba.de9
  7. 7.futterhaus.de8
  8. 8.petonline.de8

Own domain's share of all citations: 2.8%

Every question and answer
Question (original German)AIOpenAICClaudePPerplexityGGemini
Wie reklamiere ich falsche Lieferungen bei Online-Händlern für Tierfutter?
Was kann ich tun, wenn mein online bestelltes Tierzubehör beschädigt ankommt?
Was sind Alternativen zu klassischen Kratzbäumen für Katzen, die online erhältlich sind?
Online Tierfutter kaufen vs. im lokalen Geschäft – was sind die Vor- und Nachteile?
Welche Online-Optionen gibt es für natürliche Pflegeprodukte für Haustiere?
Sind Online-Shops für Tierbedarf günstiger als stationäre Läden in Deutschland?
Lohnt es sich, Premium-Tiernahrung statt Standardfutter für mein Haustier online zu bestellen?
Wo finde ich die größte Auswahl an Tiernahrung für verschiedene Haustierarten online?
Was ist besser: Trockenfutter, Nassfutter oder Frischfutter für Hunde und Katzen?
Was sind die beliebtesten Online-Shops für Tierbedarf mit schneller Lieferung in Deutschland?
Welche Online-Anbieter eignen sich am besten für die regelmäßige Lieferung von Spezialfutter bei Futtermittelunverträglichkeiten?
Gibt es Online-Shops, die Abo-Modelle für Tiernahrung und Streu anbieten?
Was kosten Bio-Tiernahrung und hochwertige Snacks im Online-Vergleich durchschnittlich?
Welche nachhaltigen Alternativen zu herkömmlichem Katzenstreu sind online verfügbar?
Wie finde ich die besten Rabatte und Gutscheine für Tierbedarf im deutschen Online-Handel?
  • Brand named, positive
  • Brand named, neutral
  • Brand named, critical
  • Only competitors named
  • Brand not named
  • No answer
Badge for your website
Agent Readiness Stufe 1, KI-Check Deutschland 2026
<a href="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/de/fressnapf" title="KI-Check Deutschland 2026: Fressnapf"><img src="https://aeo-audit.rezolve.com/de/badges/fressnapf.svg" alt="Agent Readiness Stufe 1, KI-Check Deutschland 2026" width="260" height="64"></a>

Audit completed on 21 September 2026. Methodology

Next step

How does your brand compare?

Book a 30-minute demo to see Rezolve Ai in action and what it can do for your business.

Request a demo